1 2025:CGHC:31758 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 1485 of 2018 1 - Smt. Jai Shree Sharma Wd/o Late Roshan Sharma Aged About 20 Years R/o- Village Paragaon, Post Navapara, Police Station- Gobra Nawa Para, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Abhay Sharma S/o Mahavir Sharma Aged About 22 Years R/o- Village Paragaon, Post Navapara, Police Station- Gobra Nawa Para, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Ku. Bhawna Sharma D/o Late Roshan Sharma Aged About 1 Years Aged About 1 Month Appellant Is Minor Through Legal Guardian Of Mother Smt. Jaishri Sharma, R/o- Village Paragaon, Post Navapara, Police Station- Gobra Nawa Para, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Appellant(s) versus Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 1 - Ishwar Prasad Sahu S/o Shri Hira Singh Sahu R/o- Bhakhara, Police Station Bhakhara, District- Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh., District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh. 2 - P.B.S. Oil Industries Limited Through- Manager (Owner) Vivek Agrawal P.B.S. Oild Industries Limited Arjuni Dhamtari, District- Dhamatari, Chhattisgarh., District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh. 3 - The New India Insurance Company Limited Through- Manager, The New India Insurance Kachahari Chowk Jail Road Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Bajaj Alliance General Insurance Company Limited Through- Divisional Officer, Bajaj General Insurance Company Limited, Shiv Mohan Bhawan, Devendra Nagar, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Appellant(s) : None. For Respondent(s) : None. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 09/07/2025 1. None appears for the appellants to argue the case, even in the second round, neither any representation was made to seek any adjournment. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting this case. 2. In absence of any representation on behalf of the appellant, this 3 Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the instant appeal for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the instant MAC is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat