VIKAS KUMAR SON OF SH. BABU LAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
SAW/1456/2019 · 2025-08-18
Avneesh Jhingan, Baljinder Singh Sandhu
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31097 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31097 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:32092-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 1456/2019 IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.17338/2018 Vikas Kumar Son Of Sh. Babu Lal, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of Chopra Farm, Gali No. 7, Dadwada, Kota. (Rajasthan). ----Appellant Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Local Self Government, Urban Development And Housing, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Director, Department Of Local Self Government, Residency Area, Civil Lines, Jaipur
3. Chief Executive Officer - Cum- Member Secretary, Safai Karmchari Bharti Chayan Samiti, Nagar Nigam, District- Kota (Raj.). ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Ashok Yadav with Ms. Nisha Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. G.S. Gill, AAG with Mr. Manoj Kumar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU
Order 18/08/2025
1. This is an application (CMCW No.915/2019) filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condoning the delay of two hundred eighty nine days in filing the special appeal writ.
2. For the reasons mentioned therein, the application is allowed and delay of two hundred eighty nine days in filing the special appeal is condoned.
[2025:RJ-JP:32092-DB] (2 of 2) [SAW-1456/2019]
3.
Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that SBCWP No.17338/2018 was wrongly decided by tagging it along-with SBCWP No.20108/2018 (Smt. Mohani Bai vs. State of Rajasthan & ors.) and connected matters, as the issue involved in the writ petition was not covered by the decision of this Court in SBCWP No.12762/2018 (Sunil vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.) decided on 07.09.2018.
4. In view of the above, the order dated 03.10.2018 qua writ petition No.17338/2018 passed by learned Single Judge is set aside and the matter is sent back to the learned Single Judge to decide the petition afresh in accordance with law.
5. The appeal is allowed.
(BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J RIYA/34