101 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-766-2001 (O&M) Date of decision: 07.08.2025 Anil Kumar and others ... Petitioners Vs. State of Haryana and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: None for petitioner No.1. Mr. Najar Singh, Advocate for petitioners No.2 to 7. Mr. Vikrant Pamboo, Addl. AG, Haryana for respondents No.1 & 3. Mr. Prince Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2-MC, Faridabad. ******* HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL) 1. Present civil writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of prohibition or any other appropriate writ in the nature of mandamus, certiorari, quo- warranto, prohibiting and forebidding the respondents from retrenching the services of the petitioners in violation of Sections 25-F, 25-FFF & 25-G of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. VISHNU 2025.08.07 18:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh CWP-766-2001 (O&M) -2- 2. In compliance of the order dated 21.07.2025, affidavit of Dhirendra Khadgata, IAS, Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Faridabad has been filed in the Court today, which is taken on record and copy thereof has been supplied to learned counsel appearing for petitioners No.2 to 7. 3. Learned counsel for respondent No.2 submits that present petition has been rendered infructuous. 4. Learned counsel appearing for petitioners No.2 to 7 affirms the aforesaid fact. 5. In view of the above, instant petition is disposed of having been rendered as infructuous. [ HARPREET SINGH BRAR ] 07.08.2025 JUDGE vishnu Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No VISHNU 2025.08.07 18:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh