2025:JHHC:18395-DB 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(PIL) No. 3273 of 2025 Deepak Kumar Mudi, S/o Nakul Chandra Mudi, R/o Village-Kumir, PO- Kumir, PS-Kamalpur, Block-Patamda, District-East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur … … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, Department of Revenue, Registration and Land Reforms, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi 2. The Secretary, State Level Environmental Impact Assessment Authority, Ranchi 3. The Secretary, District Level Environmental Impact Assessment Authority, East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur 4. The Deputy Commissioner, East Singhbhum 5. The Circle Officer, Patamda, East Singhbhum 6. M/s. Maa Tara Construction and Equipment Co., through its Proprietor Vishal Mahato, Village-Layadih, Mouza-Oriya, PO & PS- Patamda, East Singhbum through Amrit Mahato 7. M/s. Navin Kumar Singh, through its proprietor Navin Singh, Mouza-Bankuchia, PS-Kamalpur, Patamda, East Singhbhum 8. M/s. Shubham Singh, through its proprietor Shubham Singh, Mouza-Bankuchia, PS-Kamalpur, Patamda, East Singhbhum 9. M/s. Rajesh Kumar, through its proprietor Rajesh Kumar, Mouza- Geruala Oriya, PS-Kamalpur, Patamda, East Singhbhum 10. M/s. Nirbhay Singh, through its proprietor Nirbhay Singh, Mouza- Bankuchia, PS-Kamalpur, Patamda, East Singhbhum 11. M/s. SS Trading, through its proprietor Mithilesh Kumar, Mouza- Oriya, Patamda, East Singhbhum 12. M/s. Shahzada Sohel Khan, through its proprietor Shahzada Sohel Khan, Mouza-Geruala Oriya, Kamalpur, Patamda, East Singhbhum 13. M/s. Sanjay Kumar Singh, through its proprietor Sanjay Kumar Singh, Mouza-Geruala Oriya, Patamda, East Singhbhum ... ... Respondents ----- CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashok Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Respondent Nos.1, 4 & 5 : Mr. Piyush Chitresh, AC to AG For the Respondent Nos. 2 & 3 : Mr. Bhanu Kumar, Advocate ----- Order No. 04 Dated: 09.07.2025 Heard the counsel for the petitioner. 2. The petitioner complains of air and noise pollution allegedly caused by the respondent nos. 6 to 13. Admittedly, the petitioner has not given any complaint to the State Pollution Control Board regarding the alleged pollution being caused by the respondent 2025:JHHC:18395-DB 2 nos. 6 to 13. 3. Therefore, directing the petitioner to submit such a complaint to the said authority and directing the said authority to look into the said complaint within four weeks of its receipt, this W.P.(PIL) is disposed of. (M. S. Ramachandra Rao, C.J.) (Rajesh Shankar, J.) Manish/Ritesh