[2025:RJ-JP:6798] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18622/2012 Jay Kay Enterprises Ltd (Formerly J.K. Synthetics Ltd.) Kamla Tower Kanpur ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through Secretary to Government, Labour and Employment Department, Government of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur 2. Labour Commissioner, Shram Bhawan, Shanti Nagar, Jaipur 3. Additional Labour Commissioner, Shram Bhawan, Shanti Nagar, Jaipur 4. J.K. Tyre Cord Mazdoor Union (CITU), Indira Gandhi Nagar, Kota through its Secretary. 5. J.K. Staff Association (II) through Vice President, R.C. Bhatia son of Shri Govind Ram Ji Bhatia, resident of OQC-3, J.K. Nagar, Kota - 324003 6. Rajasthan Trade Union Kendra, Registration No. RJ/1085 through Divisional President Shri R.P. Tiwari son of Shri Gopal Dutt Tiwari Paremendra Nath Dhanda Bhawan, Chawani Road,Kota 7. M/s Arafat Petrochemicals Pvt. Ltd. Arafat Nagar, Kota ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sudhir Gupta, Sr. Adv. assisted by Mr. Ashish Sharma For Respondent(s) : Ms. Mahi Yadav, AAG Mr. Satish Pareek for Mr. Anupam Agarwal Ms. Supriya Rana for Ms. Minakshi Jain, GC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 17/02/2025 1. An application (1/2025) has been filed by and on behalf of petitioner, stating inter alia, that in view of the averments made in para No.6 of the application, petitioner wants to approach before [2025:RJ-JP:6798] (2 of 2) [CW-18622/2012] the respondents-State Authorities for resolution of the dispute in respect of attachment of the properties of petitioners against the Labour dues. 2. It has been stated in the application that as per subsequent development, no labour dues have been observed against the petitioner entailing and to continue attachment of his properties. 3. Respondents have no objection in respect of withdrawal of writ petition in the light of averments made in the application and allowing petitioner to make representation before the respondent- State Authorities. 4. In view of above, the writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn and same is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. Petitioner is at liberty to move an appropriate representation for withdrawal/ revocation of the attachment orders of the property of petitioner. 6. However, petitioner would be at liberty to take legal remedies, in case, any fresh cause of action arises. 7. Stay application and other pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J NITIN /84