Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31092 (AP)

Alapati Jayaprakash Rao, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/23454/2023 · 2025-07-30

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010454092023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 23454/2023 Between: 1. ALAPATI JAYAPRAKASH RAO,, S/O.SRIRAMULU, AGED 66 YEARS, R/O. DOOR NO.8/329, MUNGAMURU ROAD, ONGOLE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, (ERSTWHILE PRAKASAM DISTRICT) SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, ONGOLE. 3. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KANDUKUR, (ERSTWHILE PRAKASAM DISTRICT) SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. TAHSILDAR, KANDUKUR MANDAL, KANDUKUR, (ERSTWHILE PRAKASAM DISTRICT), SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order, or a Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 4threspondent indisplaying a signboard in the lands of the Petitioner proclaiming it as Government Land and denying the petitioner's lawful title to his lands as without jurisdiction, illegal, arbitrary, and as in violation of Article 300-A of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the 4th respondent to remove the sign boards erected and not to interfere with the right, title, possession and enjoyment of the agricultural lands of the petitioner in Sy No. 122-4B2 in an extent of Ac.4-52 cents situated at Kandukuru Village and Kandukur Mandal, SPSR Nellore District and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents not to interfere in any manner with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over his land in Sy. No.122-4B2 in an extent of Ac.4-52 cents situated at Kandukuru Village and Kandukur Mandal, SPSR Nellore District pending disposal of the Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SIREESHA RANI VALLABHANENI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ SUBBA REDDY SATTI, J Date: 31.07.2025 IKN THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 23454 of 2023 Date: 31.07.2025 IKN