Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31089 (JHR)

SUJIT KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./227/2025 · 2025-01-21

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.227 of 2025 ------ Sujit Kumar aged about 24 years, S/o Shiv Kumar Mehta R/o Lupung, PS- Katkamsandi Po- Katkamsandi Dist- Hazaribag (Jharkhand) .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Awanish Ranjan Mishra, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-21-01-2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending his arrest in connection with Katkamsandi P.S. Case No.182 of 2024 instituted under Sections 96/3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons abducted the minor girl who is the daughter of the informant. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the main allegation is against the co-accused Ishwar Yadav and the only allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with the co-accused Ishwar Yadav is running an orchestra group. It is also submitted that the minor girl has already been recovered from the house of the co-accused Ishwar Yadav save and except the fact that the petitioner is a friend of the co-accused, there is no other allegation against the petitioner. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of her family members in any manner during the pendency of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl.P.P appearing for the State oppposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrendering, he will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.20,000/- as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Hazaribag in connection with Katkamsandi P.S. Case No.182 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of her family members in any manner during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/