Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31086 (PNJ)

VIJENDER SINGH v. STATE OF HARYANA

CWP/763/2001 · 2025-05-03

Harsimran Singh Sethi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-763-2001 (O&M) & connected case 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (223) CWP-763-2001 (O&M) Date of Decision : April 02, 2025 Vijender Singh .. Petitioner Versus The State of Haryana and others .. Respondents (2) CWP-906-2001 (O&M) Chander Parkash .. Petitioner Versus The State of Haryana and others .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present: None for the petitioner(s). Mr. Saurabh Girdhar, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI J. (ORAL) 1. In the present writ petitions, the grievance of the petitioner(s) is that the claim raised by them under Section 33-C (2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred as ‘1947 Act’) so as to grant them the salary in the pay scale of Rs.950-1500 w.e.f. 01.02.1991 has been rejected on the ground that the same cannot be claimed under Section 33-C (2) of the 1947 Act. 2. Nothing has come on record that the petitioner(s) are in service as of now. HARSHA RANI 2025.04.04 16:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-763-2001 (O&M) & connected case 2 3. No one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner(s) to press the present writ petitions. Hence, it can be safely presumed that the petitioner(s) are not interested in pursuing the present writ petitions. 4. Dismissed for non-prosecution. 5. Civil miscellaneous application pending if any, also stands disposed of. 6. A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of other connected case. April 02, 2025 (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) harsha JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No HARSHA RANI 2025.04.04 16:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document