1 2025:CGHC:28993 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1982 of 2025 1 - Smt. Kailash @ Vilas W/o Shri Chandrabhan Rathiya Aged About 45 Years Caste Kanwar, R/o Village Kumbhichunwa (Wrongly Mentioned Kumbhichunwa), Tahsil Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Smt. Laxmi W/o Shri Ashok Aged About 42 Years Caste Kanwar R/o Village Bakaruma, Tahsil Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Smt. Lalita W/o Shri Ramesh Aged About 40 Years Caste Kanwar, R/o Village Vijay Nagar, Tahsil Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioners versus 1 - Mansingh S/o Shri Sohar Say Kanwar Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Vijay Nagar, Tahsil Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Station of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For the Petitioners : Mr. Roop Ram Naik, Advocate For the State : Ms. Sunita Manikpuri, Dy. Govt. Advocate (Hon’ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Order on Board 30/06/2025 1. In this petition filed under Section 528 of Bhartiya Nagarik Surksha Sanhita, 2023, the applicants seek a direction for early disposal of Criminal Revision No.31/2021 pending before the Additional Sessions Judge, Gharghoda, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh. A ANNAJEE RAO Digitally signed by A ANNAJEE RAO Date: 2025.07.01 17:14:52 +0530 2 2. It appears from the order dated 24.11.2021 passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Dharamjaigarh that respondent no.1 disturbed the possession of the petitioners, therefore, the petitioners filed application under Sections 145 & 146 of CrPC and in compliance of the order of the Additional Commissioner dated 01.12.2016 in 2nd appeal vide Case No.397/A-6/2014-15 (Mansingh Vs. Ganga Bai), the SDO has passed the impugned order dated 24.11.2021 (Annexure P-3) by holding that respondent no.1 has possessed over the land in question, against which, the petitioners have filed the revision petition before the Additional Sessions Judge, Gharghoda on 04.12.2021, which is pending. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants refers to the the order sheets of the Revisional Court and submits that the original records have been received by 31.01.2025. The trial court record was awaited for a long time in the revision. Now despite receiving the record, the revision is pending for 4 years. Therefore, he prays for a direction to the Additional Sessions Judge, Gharghoda to decide the revision as early as possible. 4. Looking to the limited prayer made in this petition, without touching upon merits of the case, it is directed that Additional Sessions Judge, Gharghoda, District Raigarh shall dispose of Criminal Revision No.31/2021 as early as possible preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 5. With the above observations/direction, this petition stands finally dispose off at the admission stage itself. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge Rao