Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31083 (AP)

S. Jagannadham, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/27431/2021 · 2025-02-03

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010454332021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY ,THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 27431/2021 Between: S. Jagannadham, and Others The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. D KISHORE KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. BALAJI MEDAMALLI 2. GP FOR REVENUE 3. Mattegunta.Sudhir,Standing Counsel For Z.P.Ps,M.P.Ps,Gram Panchayats The Court made the following: ORDER Despite listing the matter under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. This shows that the petitio not interested in prosecuting the matter. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY ,THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 27431/2021 S. Jagannadham, and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): Counsel for the Respondent(S): Mattegunta.Sudhir,Standing Counsel For Z.P.Ps,M.P.Ps,Gram The Court made the following: Despite listing the matter under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. This shows that the petitio not interested in prosecuting the matter. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI ...PETITIONER(S) ...RESPONDENT(S) Mattegunta.Sudhir,Standing Counsel For Z.P.Ps,M.P.Ps,Gram Despite listing the matter under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. This shows that the petitioners are In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Interim orders, if any, shall stand vacated. JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI RR