PRAKASH S/O SHRI RATAN SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/11898/2024 · 2025-01-31
Ganesh Ram Meena
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31082 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31082 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:4474] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11898/2024
1. Prakash S/o Shri Ratan Singh, R/o Village Ghusyari, Police Station Chiksana, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan). 2. Satish S/o Shri Pratap, R/o Village Ghusyari, Police Station Chiksana, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan). 3. Gopal S/o Shri Ramhet, R/o Village Ghusyari, Police Station Chiksana, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan). ----Petitioners Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sudhir Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, Public Prosecutor HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 31/01/2025
1. This anticipatory bail application has been filed by the petitioners under Section 482 B.N.S.S. arising out of F.I.R. No.149/2024, registered at Police Station Chiksana, District Bharatpur for the offences under Sections 143, 323, 341, 452 &
307. 2. Heard. 3. Looking to the allegations levelled against the petitioner, this Court vide order dated 15.10.2024 directed the accused- petitioners to appear before the Investigating Officer for interrogation. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State submits that under the directions of this Court, the petitioners have
[2025:RJ-JP:4474] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-11898/2024] appeared before the Investigating Officer and have been interrogated. 5. It is submitted by counsel for the petitioners the as per the averments made in the FIR, no allegations of causing injury to the complainant party have been levelled against the petitioners. 6. Considered the submissions made at bar. 7. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly the fact that no allegations of causing injury to the complainant party have been levelled against the petitioners and they have already been interrogated by the Investigating Officer, this Court without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 8. Accordingly, this Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed.
The S.H.O./I.O./Arresting Authority, Police Station Chiksana, District Bharatpur in connection with aforesaid FIR is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioners they shall be released on bail, provided each of them shall furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to his satisfaction on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any police officer, and
[2025:RJ-JP:4474] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-11898/2024] (iii) that the petitioners shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Satyendra/457