28 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 245-1 CRR-636-2022 (O&M) Date of decision: 04.09.2025 Sandeep and others ...Petitioners VERSUS State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Present :- Mr. Chanderhas Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Vivek Chauhan, Addl. A.G. Haryana. Mr. Sushil Sheoran, Advocate for the complainant. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The present revision petition has been filed against the interim order dated 09.03.2022, by virtue whereof the learned Sessions Judge, Bhiwani had summoned the petitioners under Section 319 of the Cr.P.C. as additional accused in case bearing FIR No.142 dated 11.07.2020, under Sections 307, 323, 449, 302, 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the trial has since then been concluded and the petitioners have been acquitted, the present petition has been rendered infructuous. Ordered accordingly. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) 04.09.2025 JUDGE Mangal Singh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No MANGAL SINGH 2025.09.08 10:55 I am the author of this document