Page No. 1/2 GAHC040003452025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/94/2025 Takam Pario Son of Late T Mangha, resident of Village D Sector, PO and PS Nirjuli, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS The State of AP and 3 Ors represented by the Commissioner and Secretary, Department of Land Management, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar. 2:The Director of Land Management Age: 0 Occupation : Itanagar Papum Pare Arunachal Pradesh. 3:The Deputy Commissioner Age: 0 Occupation : Papum Pare District at Capital Complex Itanagar Arunachal Pradesh. 4:The North East Institute of Science and Technology Age: 0 Occupation : represented by its Director Nirjuli Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh Page No. 2/2 Advocate for the Petitioner : Takam Sunil, G Basar,Mating Yaram,A Hussain,N B P Singha Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), Ninnong Ratan,S/C NERIST,Ajin Apang, Sr. Advocate BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 28.04.2026 There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner today on call. Ms. P. Sangeeta, learned Junior Government Advocate, Arunachal Pradesh for the State respondents is in attendance. On the two previous dates of listing, 08.08.2025 and 27.01.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner also on call. The State respondents were found represented on the said two occasions when the petitioner was found not represented. The issue of maintainability of the writ petition has been raised on behalf of the respondents. In view of repeated absence for three occasions, this Court persuaded to take a view that that the petitioner is no longer interested to pursue the writ petition. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed for non-prosecution. If the petitioner is still interested to pursue the writ petition, the petitioner is at liberty to file appropriate application for restoration of the writ petition. JUDGE Comparing Assistant