PARAS JAYANTILAL JAIN AND ANOTHER v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
ABA/1851/2024 · 2025-01-15
Shri R M Joshi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31076 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31076 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1851 OF 2024 Paras Jayantilal Jain And Another VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra Dr. A. N. Pedgaonkar, Advocate for applicants Smt. K. R. Jamdhade, APP for respondent/State
CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J. DATE : 15th January, 2025 PER COURT :-
1. Applicants apprehend arrest in connection with Crime No. 515/2024 with Vaijapur Police Station, Dist. Aurangabad, for the offences punishable Under Section 10-A, 7, 8 of Essential Commodities Act read with 287, 288, 3(5), 303(2) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023.
2.
Learned counsel for the applicants has drawn attention of the Court to the observation made by the Session Court while rejecting the Anticipatory Bail to the effect that there is no reference of breach of any
order impugned under Section 3 of Essential Commodities Act. In the First Information Report and consequentially Section 7 of the said act is not attracted.
3. Learned APP was unable to point out any thing contrary to 934-ABA-1851-2024.odt 1 of 2 2025:BHC-AUG:1225
the said observation.
4. In view of this, application allowed in terms of interim relief.
(R. M. JOSHI, J.) bsj 934-ABA-1851-2024.odt 2 of 2