IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 161 of 2025 ------ Arpit @ Arpit Sharma @ Arpit Pramod Sharma … … Petitioner -Versus - The State of Jharkhand ... … Opposite Party B.A. No. 262 of 2025 Vipul Singh & Ors. … … Petitioner -Versus - The State of Jharkhand ... … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH ------ For the Petitioners : M/s. Rishu Ranjan, Advocate : M/s. Aditya Banerjee, Advocate For the State : M/s. Sardhu Mahto, A.P.P. : M/s. Naveen Kr Gaunjhu, A.P.P. ----- 05/17.02.2025 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that at Paragraph-5 of order dated 06.02.2025, name of accused Sanjay Tirkey has been mentioned instead of named accused in the FIR Sanjay Mahto. 2. It was prayed that necessary correction may be made at Paragraph-5 of the Bail Application. 3. Mr. Naveen Kr Gaunjhu, learned A.P.P. has no objection to the prayer. 4. Accordingly, paragraph-5 of the Order dated 06.02.2025 shall be read as ‘learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that there was some financial dispute between the accused Sanjay Mahto and the victim, due to which, occurrence has taken place’. 5. The order dated 06.02.2025 is modified to the extent indicated hereinabove. (Ambuj Nath, J.) Nandini/- Uploaded