Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31071 (RAJ)

SHRAWAN SINGH S/O SHRI JALAM SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/12285/2025 · 2025-09-25

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:39519] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.12285/2025 Shrawan Singh S/o Shri Jalam Singh, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Village Nichli Balacharat, Police Station Todgarh, District Beawar (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail Beawar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amit Jindal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 25/09/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.92/2023, registered at Police Station Todgarh, District Ajmer, (Now in District Beawar) for the offence(s) under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended that the other similarly placed co-accused Basant Singh has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 30.05.2024 and the case of the petitioner is akin to the other co- accused Basant Singh. It is further contended that the matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate, the accused-petitioner is in custody since 12.08.2025 and the investigation is pending since [2025:RJ-JP:39519] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-12285/2025] long and trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the grant of bail application and contended that a similar FIR has already been registered against the petitioner. It is further alleged that the petitioner in connivance with co-accused Basant Singh, issued a forged patta by using a forged stamp and obtained money from persons namely; Mahendra Singh, Swai Singh, Bahadur Singh, Heera Singh, Dinesh Singh, Choon Singh, Lakshman Ram and Raju Singh, therefore, considering the allegations levelled against the petitioner and the nature of offence, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be dismissed. 4. Heard and perused the material available on the record. 5. The other similarly placed co-accused Basant Singh has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 30.05.2024, the accused-petitioner is in custody since 12.08.2025 and the trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, therefore, considering the above facts, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, this Court deems it proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner- Shrawan Singh S/o Shri Jalam Singh, in connection with FIR No.92/2023, registered at Police Station Todgarh, District Ajmer, (Now in District Beawar), shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial [2025:RJ-JP:39519] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-12285/2025] Judge for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The accused-petitioner is also directed to mark his presence on 25th of every month before the concerned Police Station till conclusion of the trial. The SHO of the concerned Police Station is directed to maintain a regular register marking the presence of the accused-petitioner and shall send the presence report of the accused-petitioner on the same day to the concerned trial Court every month without any delay. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. A copy of this order shall be sent to the concerned S.H.O. for its strict compliance. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava/-4