IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.8155 of 2024 Date of Decision: 13.10.2025 ____________________________________________________________ Smt. Neerja Gupta …….Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and Another ….Respondents ____________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Anubhav Chopra, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for State. ____________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge (oral): Bare perusal of reply filed on behalf of respondents clearly reveals that relief, as prayed for in the instant petition, has been granted to the petitioner. Through instant petition, petitioner has prayed for grant of earned leave benefit, which has been granted to him. 2. Learned counsel representing the petitioner, after having perused reply, fairly acknowledges factum with regard to grant of relief, as prayed in the petition. 3. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and accordingly the same is disposed of, as having rendered infructuous. Liberty is reserved to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings in the appropriate Court of law, qua the surviving grievance, if any. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge October 13, 2025 (Rajeev Raturi) 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?