SRI. PANDRAVETI KISHORE REDDY v. M/S. MILLENNIUM ADS
RFA/1860/2016 · 2025-07-02
Jyoti Mulimani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31066 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31066 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23570 RFA No. 1860 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1860 OF 2016 (SP) BETWEEN:
SRI. PANDRAVETI KISHORE REDDY AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, S/O. LATE GURUVA REDDY, RESIDING AT T-1, 3RD FLOOR, KINGS CLIFF APARTMENTS, NO.39, MILLERS ROAD, BENSON TOWN, BENGALURU-560 046.
ALSO AT:
NO.140, T.P.AREA, TIRUPATHI, PIN-517 501 (AP). …APPELLANT (BY SRI. B.C.SEETHARAMA RAO & SRI. ANUP SEETHARAM RAO., ADVOCATES [ABSENT])
AND:
M/S. MILLENNIUM ADS HAVING ITS OFFICE AT A-4, CASA LAVELLE, BLOCK-1, NO. 84, LAVELLE ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001,
REP. BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY & CEO, SRI. VISWANATH RAJU.
…RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SKANDA KUMAR., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. M.D.RAGHUNATH., ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23570 RFA No. 1860 of 2016
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 READ WITH ORDER XLI RULE 1 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE.
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
When the case is called, the appellant is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed on 25.06.2025, on that day, when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant, either personally or through video conferencing. Hence, for appearance of counsel for the appellant it was ordered to be listed on 02.07.2025. The appeal is listed today for appearance of counsel of the appellant. As already noted above, when the case is called, the appellant is not represented. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the Regular First Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23570 RFA No. 1860 of 2016
Because of dismissal of the appeal, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 28