Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31061 (RAJ)

DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE v. PURKHA RAM S/O SHRI TULSA RAM

WRW/208/2023 · 2025-07-03

Sudesh Bansal

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:24516] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Review Petition (Writ) No. 201/2023 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.15273/2021 1. Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. Inspector General Of Police, Ajmer. 3. Superintendent Of Police, Nagaur ----Petitioners Versus Naresh Kumar S/o Shri Sukhveer Singh, Aged About 42 Years, Head Constable No. 503, Police Station Deedwana, District Nagaur. ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Review Petition (Writ) No. 202/2023 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.15258/2021 1. Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. Inspector General Of Police, Ajmer. 3. Superintendent Of Police, Nagaur. ----Petitioners Versus Shobha Ram S/o Hardin Ram, Head Constable No. 335, Police Station Merta City, District Nagaur. ----Respondent S.B. Review Petition (Writ) No. 208/2023 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.15271/2021 1. Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. Inspector General Of Police, Ajmer. 3. Superintendent Of Police, Nagaur. ----Petitioners Versus Purkha Ram S/o Shri Tulsa Ram, Aged About 43 Years, Head Constable No. 1140, Police Line, District Nagaur. ----Respondent S.B. Review Petition (Writ) No. 209/2023 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.15256/2021 1. Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. Inspector General Of Police, Ajmer. 3. Superintendent Of Police, Nagaur. [2025:RJ-JP:24516] (2 of 3) [WRW-201/2023] ----Petitioners Versus Prem Prakash S/o Shri Jagdish, Aged About 41 Years, Head Constable No. 595, Add. S.p. Office Deedwana, District Nagaur. ----Respondent S.B. Review Petition (Writ) No. 210/2023 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.15267/2021 1. Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. Inspector General Of Police, Ajmer. 3. Superintendent Of Police, Nagaur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Om Prakash S/o Shri Shiv Karan Jat, Aged About 44 Years, Head Constable No. 403, Asp Office, District Nagaur. 2. Ridha Ram S/o Shri Sukha Ram, Hc No. 95, Posted At Police Station, Parbatsar, District Nagaur. 3. Girdhari Lal S/o Shri Nanu Ram, Hc No. 381, Posted At Asp Office, District Sikar. 4. Bajrang Lal S/o Shri Hazari Ram, Hc No. 86, Posed At Police Station Degana, Nagaur. 5. Megha Ram S/o Shri Kanha Ram, Hc No. 336, Nagaur, At Present Posted Sp Office, Nagaur. ----Respondents S.B. Review Petition (Writ) No. 214/2023 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.15278/2021 1. Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. Inspector General Of Police, Ajmer. 3. Superintendent Of Police, Nagaur. ----Petitioners Versus Madan Gopal S/o Shri Dharm Das, Aged About 39 Years, Head Constable No. 1121, Gatwa Chowki, Police Station Chitawa, District Nagaur. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Parth Sharma for Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG For Respondent(s) : [2025:RJ-JP:24516] (3 of 3) [WRW-201/2023] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 03/07/2025 1. Instant review petitions have been filed by petitioners, seeking review of the final order dated 02.02.2023 passed by this Court in batch of writ petitions, lead case being SB Civil Writ Petition No.15225/2021. 2. The final order dated 02.02.2023, sought to be reviewed, has been passed after hearing counsel for both parties and does not suffer from any error apparent on the face of record. However, learned counsel for petitioners, having instructions of petitioners, submits that petitioners do not want to pursue the review petitions on merits and seek permission to withdraw the same. Misc. applications (IA No.1/2025), seeking withdrawal of writ petitions, have also been filed in each review petition. 3. In view of above, misc. applications (IA No.1/2025) filed in each review petition, are allowed and permission for withdrawal of review petition is granted. 4. Accordingly, the review petitions are hereby dismissed as not press. 5. Stay applications and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin/117-122