1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3119 of 2020  Durga Prathamik Sahakari Upbhokta Bhandar Through President Vishwanath Sao, S/o Late Ramchandra Sao, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Camp 2, Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Revenue Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. Collector (Food), Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 3. Food Controller, Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 4. B.S.P. Prathamik Upbokta Bhandar Madala Town, Through Its President, Bhilai, Vaishali Nagar, Vidhansabha, Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 5. Maa Swar Mangala Khadya Suraksha Poshan Avam Upbhokta Seva Sahakari Samiti, Through Its President, Ward No. 4 Supela Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause Title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : None, in two rounds. For State/Respondents No. 1 : Ms. Neelima Singh Thakur, Panel Lawyer to 3 Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 21. 07.2025 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has sought the following relief(s):- “10.1 This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to set aside the impugned order dated impugned orders dated 16/10/2020 in respect of respondent no. 4 and order SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Digitally signed by SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Date: 2025.07.22 14:10:40 +0530 2 dated 16/10/2020 in respect of respondent no. 5 are collectively filed as Annexure P/1 by which illegally they have been allotted the Fair Price Shop to which the allotment order of the petitioner is still in subsistence. 10.2 This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent no. 2 and 3 to afford opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and fresh consider the allotment of shops to the respondent no 4 and 5 after due detailed inquire. 10.3 Any appropriate writ, direction or order may also kindly be passed in favour of the petitioners, which this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the circumstances of the case.” 2. It appears that two Fair Price Shops bearing ID No. 431004191 and 431004009 situated at Ward No. 16 and Ward No. 4, Bhilai, District Durg were allotted to the petitioner on 06.06.2018 and 29.08.2018 respectively. The respondent No. 3 vide order dated 16.10.2020, allotted both the Fair Price Shops to respondent No. 4/BSP Primary Sub Store Model Town and respondent No. 5/Maa Swar Mangla Food Security Nutrition and Sub Service Cooperative Society. The petitioner has challenged the orders, whereby Fair Price Shops have been allotted to respondents No. 4 & 5, but orders, whereby allotment of Fair Price Shop have been canceled, have not been challenged. 3. Taking into consideration the above defect in the writ petition, I am not inclined to grant any relief. Accordingly, the instant petition fails and is hereby dismissed. No cost(s). Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge $iddhant