2025:JHHC:17356 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 863 of 2025 ------ 1. Ganesh Roy @ Ganesh Ray, son of Rohan Ray, resident of village Pairakhop, P.O and P.S. Nala, District- Jamtara. 2. Hiralal Roy @ Hiralal Ray, C/o Rahan Ray, resident of village Pairakhop, P.O and P.S. Nala, District- Jamtara. 3. Shambhu Roy @ Shambhu Ray, son of Rohan Ray, resident of village Pairakhop, P.O and P.S. Nala, District- Jamtara. 4. Awala Roy @ Abla Roy @ Abla Ray, wife of Rohan Ray, resident of village Pairakhop, P.O and P.S. Nala, District- Jamtara. 5. Duryodhan Roy @ Duryodhan Ray, son of Motilala Ray, resident of house No. 23, Hmladih, P.O and P.S. Khaga, Deoghar, District- Jamtara. ..... Petitioner(s). Versus The State of Jharkhand ..… Opp. Party(s). ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abishek Singh, Advocate. For the State : Ms. Sushma Aind, A.P.P …..... 06/01.07.2025: Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner No. 3 (Shambhu Roy @ Shambhu Ray) has already been arrested. 2. In view of the aforesaid submission, this application has rendered infructuous, so far as petitioner No. 3 is concerned. Now, this application is confined only to petitioner Nos. 1, 2, 4 and 5. 3. This anticipatory bail application under Section(s) 482 and 484 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, has been preferred by the petitioners apprehending their arrest for offences registered under Section(s) 126(2), 115, 118(1), 118(2), 190, 191(2), 191(3) BNS, 2023. 4. Heard the parties at length and had gone through the documents, annexed along with this application. 5. Opportunity was given to the State to oppose the bail, which the State availed and opposed. 6. The allegation against the petitioners is that they have assaulted the victim. The injury is on head i.e. on the vital part of the body, which is apparent from the impugned order. 7. In view of the aforesaid facts, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to petitioner Nos. 1, 2 and 5 i.e. Ganesh Roy, @ Ganesh Ray, Hiralal Roy @ Hiralal Ray and Duryodhan Roy @ Duryodhan Ray. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail, so far as petitioner Nos. 1, 2 and 5 are concerned is rejected. 8. Considering the fact that petitioner No. 4 (Awala Roy @ Abla Roy @ Abla Ray), who is a lady, aged about 77 years, I am inclined to grant her anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the petitioner No. 4, namely, Awala Roy @ Abla Roy @ Abla Ray, is directed to surrender before the court below within four weeks from today and in the event of her surrender/arrest, the court below is directed to enlarge her on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned SDJM, Jamtara in connection with Nala P.S. Case No. 80/2024, subject to condition that one of the bailers should be close relative of the petitioner and other should be a resident of State of Jharkhand, having sufficient landed property in his/her name or in the name of his/her ancestors in which he/she is having share and to that effect, he/she has to file an affidavit before the Trial Court indicating his/her share in the property. 9. Accordingly, this application is partly allowed. 9. Accordingly, this application is partly allowed. Anu/-C.P.-3 (ANANDA SEN, J.)