LADDU LAL BAURI ALIAS LADDU GOPAL v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./346/2025 · 2025-01-24
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31048 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31048 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No.346 of 2025
------
1. Laddu Lal Bauri @ Laddu Gopal @ Ladu Gopal, Son of Dulal Bauri @ Dulal Chandra Bauri, aged about 31 years.
2. Vikash Kumar Bauri @ Vikash Bauri, Son of Dulal Bauri @ Dulal Chandra Bauri, aged about 28 years. Both resident of Ranguni, P.O.-Bhuli Nagar, P.S.-Tetulmari, Dist.- Dhanbad, Jharkhand-828105
.... .... …. Petitioners
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioners : Ms. Aulia Begum, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Abhay Kumar Tiwari, Addl. P.P.
------
Order No.02 Dated- 24-01-2025
Heard the parties.
Apprehending their arrest in connection with Katras (East Basuriya) P.S. Case No.220 of 2024 instituted under Sections 109 and 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons attempted to murder the informant. It is next submitted that the main allegation against the Surya Singh. It is further submitted that at para-127 of the case diary, it has been mentioned that petitioner no.2 was not present at the place of occurrence and petitioner No.1 did not came to rescue of the informant, hence he has been made as accused of this case. It is further submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. It is further submitted that the petitioners undertake that they will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of her family members in any manner during the pendency of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners undertake to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privileges of anticipatory bail.
Learned Addl.P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrendering, they will be enlarged on bail depositing Rs.5,000/- each as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Dhanbad, in connection with Katras (East Basuriya) P.S. Case No.220 of 2024 with the condition that they will co- operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish their mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the pendency of the case and they will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of her family members in any manner during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita,
2023.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Rohit/