- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:14097 WP No. 7083 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO.7083 OF 2020 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. MRS. SUMA ABRAHAM W/O SRI TOMY JOSEPH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT PARAPPANATTU PADAVAIL MEENACHEL TALUK KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, KERALA STATE REPRESENTED BY HER GPA HOLDER MR. K.J. THOMAS AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS S/O K.C. JOSEPH R/AT KANJIRATINGAL HOUSE MARNE VILLAGE AND POST KARKALA TALUK UDUPI DISTRICT-574 104. …PETITIONER [BY SRI JAYAKARA SHETTY H., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)] AND: 1. MANGALURU ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED BEJAI, MANGALORE REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR-575 001. 2. MR. ISWARA NAIK AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS S/O NARAYANA NAIK JUNIOR ENGINEER, MESCOM KARKALA TALUK-574 104. 3. MR. PANDURANGA AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, Digitally signed by H K HEMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:14097 WP No. 7083 of 2020 S/O LATE RAMAPPA ASSISTANT LINEMAN, SECTION OFFICE MESCOM, NITTE KARKALA TALUK-574 104. 4. MR. SHRIKANTHA NAIK AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS S/O JAYA NAIK KALLAPU HOUSE, PALLI KALLYA VILLAGE KARKALA TALUK-574 104. 5. MR. RAVINDRA NAIK AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, S/O NARAYANA NAIK KALLAPU HOUSE, PALLI KALLYA VILLAGE KARKALA TALUK-574 104. 6. MR. PRANESH POOJARY AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, S/O SHANKARA POOJARY KALLAPU KUNTADY, KALLYA VILLAGE KARKALA TALUK-574 104. 7. MR. BALAKRISHNA NAIK AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, S/O MARU NAIK PADU KALLAPU, PALLI, KALLYA VILLAGE KARKALA TALUK-574 104. 8. MR. ANNU NAIK AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, S/O LATE DOOMA NAIK PADUKALLAPU HOUSE PALLI, KALLYA VILLAGE KARKALA TALUK-574 104. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. RAKSHITHA D.J., ADVOCATE FOR R.1 TO R.3; R.4 TO R.8 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED.) - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:14097 WP No. 7083 of 2020 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER ANNEXURE-A DATED 19.06.2019 MADE IN O.S.NO.73/2016 PASSED BY THE COURT OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ACJM., AT KARKALA, DISMISSING THE MEMO DATED 03.06.2019 AND THEREBY DISMISSING THE APPLICATION I.A.NO.3 FILED UNDER ORDER 26 RULE 9 READ WITH SECTION 151 OF CPC., AND KINDLY ALLOW I.A.NO.3 FILED BY THE PETITIONER, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN ORAL ORDER None appears for the petitioner even when the matter is called out for the second time today. The writ petition is of the year 2020. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE hkh. List No.: 1 Sl No.: 46