[2025:RJ-JP:39481] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12230/2025 Hari Om S/o Deep Chand, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village And Post Kanwada, P.S. Jhalarapatan, District Jhalawar At Present Serving As Additional Administrative Officer At Office Of Mahila Adhikarita Vibhaag (Directorate Of Women Empowerment), Jhalawar (Raj.) (At Present Confined At Central Jail, Kota). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tanmay Dhand For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Asst. G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 24/09/2025 1. This bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.230/2025 registered at Police Station C.P.S. Jaipur, District ACB District for offences punishable under Section 61(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (in short, ‘BNS’), 2023 and Section 7 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (As Amended 2018). 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended that false recovery of bribe amount of Rs.10,000/- has been shown from the possession of the petitioner and it has been alleged that same was kept between the files. It is contended that trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Counsel submits that petitioner is in custody since 04.09.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. [2025:RJ-JP:39481] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-12230/2025] 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the prayer for bail made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. Heard. Perused the material available on record. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, especially considering the fact that petitioner is in custody since 04.09.2025, so also the fact that further recovery or investigation is not required from the petitioner and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion, but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of this case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Hari Om S/o Deep Chand, shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /243