Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
218
COCP-1010-2020 (O&M)
Date of decision: 11.08.2025
Ish Kumar and others
…Petitioners V/s Dr. Jagbir Singh and others
…Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: None for the petitioners.
Mr. K.K. Gupta, Advocate, for respondents No.1 and 2.
Mr. I.S. Sidhu, Advocate, for respondent No.3. Mr. Anuj Garg, DAG, Haryana.
*** VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J (ORAL)
Concededly, directions passed in CWP-11944-2019 on 06.05.2019 have been complied with. However, vide order dated 16.09.2024, time was given to the State to seek instructions as to why similar benefits had not been accorded to other similarly placed employees.
2.
No one has appeared on behalf of the petitioners despite the case having been called twice.
3.
It appears that petitioners are no longer interested in pursuing the instant contempt petition.
4.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(VIKRAM AGGARWAL)
JUDGE August 11, 2025 vcgarg
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable
: Yes/No VIKAS CHANDER 2025.08.11 18.01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document