Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31038 (RAJ)

SITARAM S/O LALLU NATH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/14698/2025 · 2025-09-23

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:39130] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14698/2025 1. Sitaram S/o Lallu Nath, Resident Of Rameda, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa, Rajasthan. 2. Ramjivan S/o Ramesh, Resident Of Rameda, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa, Rajasthan. 3. Harkesh S/o Jagdish, Resident Of Rameda, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa, Rajasthan. 4. Kamal S/o Mandari, Resident Of Rameda, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa, Rajasthan. 5. Ramotar S/o Prabhatya, Resident Of Rameda, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa, Rajasthan. 6. Amar Singh S/o Ramcharan, Resident Of Rameda, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Tehsildar, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa, Rajasthan. ----Respondent Connected with S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13077/2025 1. Nand Kishore Meena S/o Shri Ram Kishan Meena, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Village Rameda, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa, Rajasthan. 2. Jaldhari Meena S/o Prahalad Meena, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Village Rameda, Tehsi Sikrai, District Dausa, Rajasthan. 3. Kamlesh Kumar Meena S/o Sukhpal Meena, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Village Rameda, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The District Collector Officer, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa-303303, Rajasthan. [2025:RJ-JP:39130] (2 of 3) [CW-14698/2025] 3. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa- 303303, Rajasthan. 4. The Tehsildar, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa-303303 5. Sitaram, S/o Lallunath 6. Ramjivan, S/o Ramesh 7. Harkesh, S/o Jagdish 8. Kamal, S/o Mandari 9. Ramavatar, S/o Prabhatya 10. Amar Singh S/o Ramcharan, Respondent No. 5 To 10, All Residents Of Village Rameda, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jai Kishan Yogi & Mr. Yenu Satyan (IN SBCWP No. 14698/2025) Mr. Imran Khan with Mr. Monu Kumar (IN SBCWP No. 13077/2025) For Respondent(s) : Mr. V. D. Gathala, AGC with Mr. Hamendra Kumar Meena, Tehsildar, Shikarai Mr. Imran Khan with Mr. Monu Kumar (IN SBCWP No. 14698/2025) Mr. Jai Kishan Yogi & Mr. Yenu Satyan (IN SBCWP No. 13077/2025) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 23/09/2025 Learned counsel fro the petitioners has submitted that instant matter has akin factual matrix and legal issued as that of SBCWP No. 13077/2025, therefore the same be tagged. In SBCPW No. 13077/2025, qua respondent-State, Mr. V. D. Gathala, AGC has marked presence in the Court. [2025:RJ-JP:39130] (3 of 3) [CW-14698/2025] In compliance with the directions passed vide order dated 01.09.2025, concerned Tehsildar has also marked presence in the Court and has submitted that encroachments in question is removed a day prior. It is further submitted that, as on date, lis in question, does not survive. Learned counsel for the petitioners in SBCPW No. 14698/2025 has submitted that present matter has become infructuous. Learned counsel for the petitioners in SBCPW No. 13077/2025 has submitted that statements made by the learned counsel for the petitioner in SBCPW No. 14698/2025 as well as Government Authorities, are illusionary, however, qua the said contention no evidences are furnished. In light of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and concerned Tehsildar, this Court deems it appropriate to dismiss the present petitions as rendered infructuous. Howsoever, petitioners in SBCPW No. 13077/2025 are at liberty to revive the petition, if facts are otherwise. Accordingly, the present petitions are dismissed. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /30