Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31034 (KAR)

M/S. SELVAM METALS AND ALLOYS v. MR.MANOHARAN G

CRL.P/9723/2022 · 2025-06-18

J M Khazi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21088 CRL.P No. 9723 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9723 OF 2022 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. M/S. SELVAM METALS AND ALLOYS REP BY ITS MANAGING PARTNERS, MR KRISHNAMURTHY MRS. RANI KRISHNAMURTHY & MR.SELVAM @ SELVA GANESH HAVING FACTROY AT PLOT NO.37, 2ND MAIN ROAD, 2ND PHASE, 2ND CROSS, KIADB INDUSTRIAL AREA MALUR, MALUR TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT, KOLAR-563 130. 2. MR.KRISHNAMURTHY K S/O S.KONDAPPAN CHETTIYAR AGED 56 YEARS 3. MRS.RANI KRISHNAMURTHY W/O KRISHNAMURTY AGED 52 YEARS 4. MR.SELVAM @ SELVA GANESH S/O KRISHNAMURTHY AGED 34 YEARS, ALL ARE R/AT PERMANENT ADDRESS NO.100, 3RD CROSS, 1ST MAIN ROAD, Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21088 CRL.P No. 9723 of 2022 PRAKASH NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 021. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. H SURESH, ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND: MR.MANOHARAN G S/O LATE GANGARAJ AGED 64 YEARS, R/AT NO.2, VENKATARAMAPPA ROAD, JAI BHARATH NAGAR, BENGALURU-560033. …RESPONDENT (NIL) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 21.05.2022 PASSED IN I.A. U/S 143(A) OF N.I. ACT BY THE HONOURABLE XXXIII ADDL.C.M.M., BENGALURU PASSED IN C.C.NO.52081/2020. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MS JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI ORAL ORDER No representation for petitioner. No representation for petitioner even in the afternoon session. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21088 CRL.P No. 9723 of 2022 On 10.06.2025, a conditional order was passed to the effect that if steps not taken within one week in respect of respondent No.2, necessary orders would be passed. Despite the same, needful is not done. It appears petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, petition is dismissed for default. Sd/- (J.M.KHAZI) JUDGE RR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6