Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31034 (JHR)

PRADEEP GANJHU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./30/2025 · 2025-01-10

Ambuj Nath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 30 of 2025 ------ Pradeep Ganjhu, aged about 26 years, S/o. Late Damodar Ganjhu, R/o. Vill.- Pindercom, P.O. & P.S.- Balumath, Dist.- Latehar, Jharkhand. … … Petitioner -Versus - The State of Jharkhand ... … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH ------ For the Petitioner : M/s. Khalida Haya Rashmi, Advocate For the State : Mr. Arup Kr. Dey, A.P.P. ------ 02/10.01.2025 Heard the parties. 2. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with S.T. Case No. 57/2023 arising out of Chandwa P.S. Case No. 92/2020 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 67/2021, for the offences registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 384, 504 & 379 of the I.P.C. and Section 17(i)(ii) of the C.L.A. Act, pending in the Court of Sri Manoj Kumar Singh, learned Sessions Judge, Latehar. 3. On 08.07.2020, rangdari was demanded from the Informant, who is the staff of M.G. Contractors’ Pvt. Ltd. The company was laying railway line. 4. It appears that the petitioner is a member of P.L.F.I. organization and accused persons also looted six mobile phones from the labourers of the company. It further appears, witnesses namely Pritam Kumar and Ramsevak Yadav have implicated the petitioner in the present occurrence. It also appears that the petitioner has got several criminal antecedents. 5. In view of the aforesaid facts, I am not inclined to release the petitioner, on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail stands rejected. (Ambuj Nath, J.) Rahul/-