APHC010451062025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRlOl PRADESH AT AMARAVXtI ir- 0H? \ TUESDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE SRI AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT APPEAL NO: 949 OF 2025 15 of the Letters Patent against the order the file of this Hon’ble High Writ Appeal under clause dated 19.08.2025 in W.P.No.8112 of 2025 on Court. Between: 1. Ramadeni Pullamma, w/o 78 years 2. Ramadeni Tulasi Babu, S/o about 60 years Both 1 and 2 are Residing at ' Machilipatnam Ramadeni Venkata Subba Rao, Aged about Ramadeni Venkata Subba Rao, Aged D.No.3-19, Chittipalem, near ramalayam, Hussainpalem, Chittipalem, Krishna District. ...APPELLANTS/PETITIONERS AND Panchayatraj Department, Rep. by its Amaravati, 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Principal Secretary, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi Guntur District. 2. The Collector( Panchayatraj), Krishna.District, Andhra Pradesh 3. Arisepalli Panchayat, Machilipafnam North Mandal, Krishna District Rep. by its Panchayath Secretary Tahsildar, Machilipatnam North Mandal 4. Mandal Executive Officer Krishna District (Cause Title is amended as per order passed in lA No 3 of 2025.) Machilipatnam urban Development Authority, Krishna Court order dated 14/08/2025 vide 5. The Chairman, District, Machilipatnam 6. Nandyala Dinesh, S/o Nandyala Suresh Babu D.No.1/55, Potumeeda Village Kodur Mandal, Krishna District Aged-.Major, R/o ...RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENTS lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the order dated 19.08.2025 in l.A.No.2 of 2025 in W.P.No.8112 of 2025 pending disposal of the above W.A. Counsel for the Petitioners: M/s.CH VEDAVANI Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEVELOPMENT Counsel for the Respondent No.3:SRI Y. KOTESWARA RAO, SC FOR ZPP, MPP & GRAM PANCHAYAT Counsel for the Respondent No.4: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.5: SRI SOMISETTY GANESH BABU, SC FOR VUDA and MUDA Counsel for the Respondent No.6:SRI B. V. ANJANEYULU The Court made the following: JUDGMENT APHC010451062025 Bench Sr.No:-7 [3483] IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WRIT APPEAL NO: 949 of 2025 Ramadeni Pullamma and another ...Appellants Vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh and others ...Respondents ********** Advocate for Appellants Advocate for Respondents Sri Ch. Vedavani Learned Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development, Sri B. V. Anjaneyulu, Sri Yarraguntia Koteswara Rao, learned Standing Counsel for Arisepalli Panchayat. CORAM :THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DATE : 2nd September 2025 PC : The present Writ Appeal has been preferred against the order dated 19.08.2025 passed in I.A.No.2 of 2025 in Writ Petition No.8112 of 2025. The case of the appellants before the learned single Judge was that no permission for carrying out any construction activity by respondent No.6 could be granted without obtaining the requisite permission to convert the agricultural land for non agricultural purposes for which only the Revenue Divisional Officer could have granted permission. 2. 2 that subsequently, the respondents, in their counter affidavit, record the permission which was granted for converting the land in 3. It appears placed on question for user for non agricultural purposes. Learned counsel for the appellants would submit that the said order for permitting conversion was ante dated as when the case had come up before the learned single Judge on the earlier date of hearing, a statement had been made that the permission had not been obtained as yet. 4. do not wish to enter into the issue at this stage. It would be open to the writ petitioners to challenge the grant of permission if it is otherwise not in accordance with the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Agricultural Land (Conversion for Non Agricultural Purposes) Act, 2006. We do not find any merit in the present appeal. 5. We, however. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- V.DIWAKAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR sect(^ officer 6. //TRUE COPY// To, M/s.Ch Vedavani, Advocate [OPUC] Sri Y. Koteswara Rao, SC for ZPP, MPP & Gram 1. One CC to 2. One CC to PanchayatfOPUC] CC to Sr, Somisetty Ganesh Babu, SC For VUDA and MUDA 3. One [OPUC] 4 One CC to Sri B. V. Anjaneyulu, Advocate [OPUC] 5. TWO CCS to GP for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 6. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, 7. Two CD Copies. High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] ssb HIGH COURT DATED:02/09/2025 JUDGMENT WA No.949 OF 2025 a 1 S SEP 2025 pni Co' ^^sCjiirent SectiooX^'^"^ '■'^sseaifisss^ DISMISSING THE W.A. WITHOUT COSTS