APHC010451362025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 9045/2025 Between: 1. B. CHINNA VENKATARAMANA ALIAS B. CHINNA, VENKATA RAMANA MURTHY S/O B.VENKATA SUBBARAO AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, M/S LAKSHMI NARAYANA TRADERS, 3/80, KRISHNUDI GUDI CENTRE, BENDAPUDI, THONDANGI MANDAL, EAST GODAVRI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, through S.H.O., Tuni Proh. and Excise Station , East Godavari District, rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court, Amaravati. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Courtpleased to call for the records relating to the F.I.R.No. 197 of 2016-17 on the file of Tuni Proh. and Excise Station, East Godavari District, and quash the proceedings thereon, and to grant IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with filing of the certified copy of the F.I.R.No. 197 of 2016-17 on the file of Tuni Proh. and Excise Station, East Godavari District in the interests of justice. 2 IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in F.I.R.No. 197 of 2016-17 on the file of Tuni Proh. and Excise Station, East Godavari District, pending disposal of the Criminal petition, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. PILLIX LAW FIRM Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 3 The Court made the following ORDER: The instant petition under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita has been filed, by the Petitioner/Accused , seeking quashment of the proceedings against him in FIR No.197 of 2016, of Tuni Prohibition & Excise Police Station, East Godavari District. 2. Heard Sri Pillix law firm, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Ms. K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the State. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioner and acceded to, by the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor that the subject matter of this Criminal Petition is squarely covered by the similar orders passed by this Court in Criminal Petition Nos.6911 of 2019, 7742 of 2019, 4826 of 2020 and 7593 of 2021, dated 15.11.2019, 19.02.2020, 03.11.2020 and 30.12.2021 respectively. 4. For ready reference, the order passed in Criminal Petition No.7742 of 2019 is extracted hereunder: “Learned counsel for the petitioner submits the petitioner isthe proprietor of M/s. Sri Ramakrishna Jaggery and General Stores, while he was brining black jaggery for the purpose of his business, the same was seized under the cover of mediator’s report. He further submits that even on consideration of the entire averments in the mediators report, which lead to registration of the subject crime, the petitioner only allegedly indulged in transportation of black jaggery. As per G.O.Ms.No.149, Revenue (Excise-II) Department, dated 18.04.2017, black jaggery is an agricultural produce and; therefore, the penal provisions are not attracted to the case on hand. He also 4 has drawn the attention of this Court to the earlier orders of this Court in Crl.P.No.10083 of 2011 dated 02.11.2018, wherein, in the similar circumstances, this Court, quashed the proceedings therein and also the order in Crl.P.No.52 of 2010, dated 30.04.2010, wherein the criminal proceedings against the petitioners were quashed. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor fairly states that the matter is a covered matter. Having regard to the facts and submissions and the legal position, this Court is of the considered view that valid and sufficient grounds are made out for quashing the proceedings against the petitioner. In the result, the criminal petition is allowed and the proceedings in F.I.R.No.262 of 2019, on the file of the Thondangi Police Station, East Godavari District, registered for the offence under Section 34(e) of A.P. Prohibition Act, 1995 and Section 3 of the GUR (Regulation of Use) Order, 1968, are hereby quashed.” 5. Hence, following the said Orders passed by this Court in Criminal Petition No.7742 of 2019, dated 19.02.2020 and Criminal Petition Nos.6911 of 2019, 4826 of 2020 and 7593 of 2021, and taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, this criminal petition is allowed by quashing the proceedings against the petitioner in FIR No.197 of 2016, of Tuni Prohibition & Excise Police Station, East Godavari District. 6. In the result, the Criminal Petition is allowed. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 02.09.2025 MH 5 54 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Crl.P.No.9045 of 2025 Dt.02.09.2025 MH