Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:CGHC:35263-DB
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WA No. 474 of 2025 The Managing Director Chhattisgarh Infrastructure Development Corporation Old PHQ Campus Raipur
... Appellant(s) versus 1 - Tarprit Kaur D/o Late Achal Singh Aged About 28 Years Occupation Un Employed R/o New Rambhata Jawahar Nagar, Raighar District - Raigarh Chhattisgarh 2 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Chief Secretary, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan Nava Raipur Atal Nagar District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 - General Administration Department Through Its Secretary, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan Nava Raipur Atal Nagar, District - Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Water Resource Department Through Its Secretary Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan Nava Raipur Atal Nagar District - Raipur (C.G.) 5 - Collector District Mahasamund C.G. 6 - C E O Zila Panchayat Mahasamund, District Mahasamund C.G. 7 - Transport Department, Through Its Secretary, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur Atal Nagar C.G. ...Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Appellant : Shri Rajeev Shrivastava, Senior Advocate along with Shri Vivek Siddharth Ojha, Advocate For Respondent/State : Shri SS Baghel, Dy GA For Private Respondent : Shri Sumit Shrivastava, Advocate --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Digitally signed by V PADMAVATHI Date: 2025.07.24 10:39:36 +0530
Wa 474 of 2025 2 Order on Board Per
Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice
23.07.2025 Heard Shri Rajeev Shrivastava, learned Senior Advocate along with Shri Vivek Siddharth Ojha, learned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Shri SS Baghel, learned Dy GA, and Shri Sumit Shrivastava, learned counsel for the respective respondents.
1. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the appellant prays for withdrawal of the appeal with liberty to avail other alternative remedy available to him under the provisions of law.
2. Prayer is allowed.
3. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice
padma