APHC010450812019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 398/2020 Between: 1. BHIMAVARAPU SUDHA RANI, W/O SRINIVASA RAO AGED 41 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O VILLAGE, THRIPURANTHAKAM MANDAL PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 2. PATTIPATI RAMA DEVI,, W/O. VENKATESWARLU, AGED 48 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O GOLLAPALLI VILLAGE, THRIPURANTHAKAM MANDAL PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE. 3. DY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MARKAPUR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT., 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, YERRAGONDAPALEM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, THRIPURANTHAKAM POLICE STATION, THRIPURANTHAKAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 6. MADDIKUNTA PEDDA GURAVAIAH, S/O CHINA SUBBAIAH AGED 72 2 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O NADIGADDA VILLAGE, THRIPURANTHAKAM MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT., 7. SANE VENKATA RAMANA, S/O VENKATA RANGAIAH AGED 47 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O GOLLAPALLI VILLAGE, THRIPURANTHAKAM MANDAL PRAKASAM DISTRICT., 8. SANE CHINA SESHAMMA, W/O VENKATA RAMANA AGED 40 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION R/O GOLLAPALLI VILLAGE, THRIPURANTHAKAM MANDAL PRAKASAM DISTRICT 9. KATIKI THIRUPATHI, S/O VENKATAIAH AGED 60 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION R/O GOLLAPALLI VILLAGE, THRIPURANTHAKAM MANDAL PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents particularly of respondents 3 to 5, at the instance of respondent 6 to 9 and others, in insisting the Petitioners to appear before their authority, yield and settle to the terms of Respondents 6 to 9 and others and vacate from their Agricultural Land property of Ac 17.19 Cents and further extent of Ac 10.50 Cents covered by Sy. No. 96/3 of Thimmanapalem Revenu Village, Thripuranthakam Mandal in Prakasam District respectively held by the petitioners, apart from insisting the petitioners to give up the Paddy Crop raised by them in their land in favour of the said rival claimants Respondents 6 to 9 and others as illegal, irregular, irrational, without any Jurisdiction and authority of law and violative of articles 14, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the personal life, liberty and property of the petitioners in any manner IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents particularly respondents 3 to 5 not to interfere with the personal life, liberty and property of Agricultural Land of Ac 17.19 Cents and further extent of Ac 10.50 Cents covered by Sy. No: 96/3 of Thimmanapalem Revenu Village, Thripuranthakam Mandal in Prakasam District respectively 3 held by the petitioners in any manner, pending disposal of main Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SIVA SANKARA RAO BORRA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 4 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents particularly of respondents 3 to 5, at the instance of respondent 6 to 9 and others, in insisting the Petitioners to appear before their authority, yield and settle to the terms of Respondents 6 to 9 and others and vacate from their Agricultural Land property of Ac 17.19 Cents and further extent of Ac 10.50 Cents covered by Sy. No. 96/3 of Thimmanapalem Revenu Village, Thripuranthakam Mandal in Prakasam District respectively held by the petitioners, apart from insisting the petitioners to give up the Paddy Crop raised by them in their land in favour of the said rival claimants Respondents 6 to 9 and others as illegal, irregular, irrational, without any Jurisdiction and authority of law and violative of articles 14, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the personal life, liberty and property of the petitioners in any manner...…” 2. Heard Sri Siva Sankara Rao Borra, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned Government Pleader for Home would submit that basing on the representation of the petitioners two crimes have registered against the unofficial respondents. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that recording the same, the writ petition may be disposed of. 5 5. Recording the submission of learned Assistant Government Pleader, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 04.08.2025 MH 6 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 37 W.P.No.398 of 2020 Dated.04.08.2025 MH