Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31022 (CHH)

MANAGING DIRECTOR v. ABHISHEK WAGH

WA/495/2025 · 2025-07-21

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:CGHC:34745-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WA No. 495 of 2025 Managing Director Chhattisgarh Infrastructure Development Corporation, Chhattisgarh Rajya Kaushal Vikas Pradhikaran Bhawan Second Floor, Old Phq Campus, Near Raj Bhawan, Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Appellant(s) versus 1 - Abhishek Wagh S/o Late Manohar Lal Wagh Aged About 26 Years R/o Near Ruchi Sari Centre Pandey Dairy Changora Bhata District - Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary General Administration Department, Mantralay, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Collector Collectorate Office, Raipur District - Raipur Chhattisgarh ...Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Appellant : Shri Rajeev Shrivastava, Senior Advocate along with Shri Vivek Siddharth Ojha, Advocate For Respondent/State : Shri Sangharsh Pandey, Dy GA For Private Respondent : Shri Vaibhav Shukla, Advocate --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 22.07.2025 Heard Shri Rajeev Shrivastava, learned Senior Advocate along with Shri Vivek Siddharth Ojha, learned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Digitally signed by ALOK SHARMA Date: 2025.07.23 12:15:57 +0530 Wa 495 of 2025 2 Shri Sangharsh Pandey, learned Dy GA, and Shri Vaibhav Shukla, learned counsel for the respondents. 1. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the appellant prays for withdrawal of the appeal with liberty to avail other alternative remedy available to him under the provisions of law. 2. Prayer is allowed. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice padma