[2025:RJ-JP:39380] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12218/2025 Bharat Singh S/o Raghuraj Singh, Aged About 48 Years, R/o 1-Th-6 Adarsh Block Vigyan Nagar Kota Police Station Thana Vigyan Nagar District Kota Rajasthan. (At Present Confined At District Jail Bundi) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abdul Kalam Khan Mr. Ritesh Kumawat Ms. Simran Bharti For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Asst. G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 24/09/2025 1. This bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.290/2022 registered at Police Station Sadar Bundi, District Bundi for offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of IPC. Investigation is being conducted for offences punishable under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of IPC. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended that other co-accused persons have already been granted benefit of bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. It is submitted that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. It is contended that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. It is contended that petitioner is in custody since 07.09.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. [2025:RJ-JP:39380] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-12218/2025] 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the prayer for bail made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. Heard. Perused the material available on record. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, especially considering the fact that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate, as also the fact that other co-accused persons have already been granted benefit of bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, so also the fact that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of this case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Bharat Singh S/o Raghuraj Singh, shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /239