Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31016 (RAJ)

SMT. LAXMI W/O SHRI BAHADUR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/12204/2025 · 2025-09-24

Anil Kumar Upman

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:39369] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12204/2025 Smt. Laxmi W/o Shri Bahadur, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Near Moti Maharaj Mandir, Bhoi, Mohalla, Chhavni, Police Station Gumanpura, Kota City, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Kota). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Anushree Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Asst. G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 24/09/2025 1. This bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.185/2024 registered at Police Station Kishorepura, District Kota City for offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 469, 471 and 120B of IPC. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate and are based on documents. It is submitted that all documents have already been seized by the Investigating Agency. It is submitted that dispute is related to property for which a civil suit has already been filed and same is pending before the civil Court. It is submitted that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. It is submitted that petitioner is female and she is in custody since 01.09.2025. [2025:RJ-JP:39369] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-12204/2025] Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the prayer for bail made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. Heard. Perused the material available on record. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, especially considering the fact that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate, so also the fact that petitioner is female and she has no criminal antecedents and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of this case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Smt. Laxmi W/o Shri Bahadur, shall be released on bail provided she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that she shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /233