Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31015 (RAJ)

BIFF AND BRIGHT WELFARE SOCIETY v. STATE TECHNICAL EDU DEPT ORS

CW/9987/2017 · 2025-04-24

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9987/2017 Biff And Bright Welfare Society Vp Padasoli, Nh-8, Dudu, Jaipur- 303008 Rajasthan Through Power Of A, R/o B-126, Tulsi Marg, Hanuman Nagar, Vaishali Knagar, Jaipur Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan Through Principal Secretary To Government, Technical Education Department, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Rajasthan Technical University, Kota Through Its Registrar. 3. The All India Council For Tec Nical Education, Nelson Mandela Marg, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi Through The Member Secretary. 4. The State Level Fee Determination Committee, Technical Education Building, Near Khaitan Polytechnic College, Jhalana Doongari, Jaipur Through Its Member Secretary. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9988/2017 Aryabhatta Academic Society, Opp. Agarwal School, Near Patel Indoor Stadium, Ajmer 305001 Rajasthan Through Power Of Attorney/authorization Letter Holder Dr. Amit Shastri S/o Shri Dr. B.r. Shastri Aged About 36 Years R/o Plot No. 41-B, Jai Hanuman Colony, Kayad Road, Ghooghra, Ajmer 305504 Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan Through Principal Secretary To Government, Technical Education Department, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Rajasthan Technical University, Kota Through Its Registrar. 3. The All India Council For Tecnical Education, Nelson Mandela Marg, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi Through The Member Secretary. 4. The State Level Fee Determination Committee, Technical (2 of 2) [CW-9987/2017] Education Building, Near Khaitan Polytechnic College, Jhalana Doongari, Jaipur Through Its Member Secretary. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Dr. Pushpendra Pal Singh For Respondent(s) : JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 24/04/2025 1. Counsel for the petitioners submits that by efflux of time, the instant writ petitions have become infructuous. 2. Both the instant writ petitions are dismissed as having become infructuous. The stay applications and all pending applications, if any, also stand dismissed. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/82-83