Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3101 (RAJ)

PREMARAM @ PRAVEEN S/O SHRI SAMPAT LAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/515/2025 · 2025-03-18

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:11948] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 515/2025 Premaram @ Praveen S/o Shri Sampat Lal, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village Kotdi, P.s. Purangarh District Ajmer At Present Residence Rawaton Ka Gana Palra P.s. Adarsh Nagar, District Ajmer. At Present In Central Jail Ajmer. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 18/03/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.286/2024 registered at Police Station Gandhi Nagar (Ajmer), District Ajmer for the offence(s) under Sections 305(e) and 331(4) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the other co-accused have already been enlarged on bail. The accused-petitioner is in custody since long and trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. [2025:RJ-JP:11948] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-515/2025] 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. It is alleged against the accused-petitioner that he along with the other co-accused committed robbery by removing the ATM machine. The accused-petitioner was found to be involved in 19 other similar nature of cases, therefore, considering the conduct of the accused-petitioner, this Court is not inclined to enlarged the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application of the accused-petitioner is hereby, dismissed. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/10