RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. v. SMT. MEENA MANHARE
MCC/21/2021 · 2025-01-17
Shri Sanjay Agrawal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31009 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31009 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:3193
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 21 of 2021 1 - Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. Through Manager, Krishna Complex, Kutchery Chowk, At Present Branch Office- Ravi Bhawan G.E. Road Raipur, Police Station Golbazar Raiipur (C.G.).
... Applicant (s) versus 1 - Smt. Meena Manhare Wd/o Late Dukhuram Manhare, Aged About 38 Years, 2 - Sajit Kumar S/o Late Dukhuram Mahnare, Aged About 17 Years, (Minor) 3 - Ku. Anita D/o Late Dukhuram Manhare, Aged About 16 Years, (Minor) 4 - Amit Kumar S/o Late Dukhuram Manhare, Aged About 14 Years, (Minor) 5 - Ku. Sunita D/o Late Dukhuram Manhare, Aged About 10 Years, (Minor) Respondents No. 2 to 5 Minor Represented Through Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Meena Manhare Wd/o Late Dukhuram Manhare, All Are R/o Village- Binori, Tahsil Masturi, Police Station Masturi, District Bilaspur (C.G.). (Claimants) [ 6 - Manglu Yadav S/o Pardeshi Yadav, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Village Kaneri, Tahsil Bilha, Police Station Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.). (Driver Of Metador No. C.G. 10 ZB 1174). 7 - Roshanlal Bhardwaj S/o Shri Thakurram Bhardwaj, R/o Village Dhoradih (Pachpedi), Post Loharshi, Tahsil Masturi, Police Station Masturi, District Bilaspur (C.G.). (Owner Of Metador No. C.G. 10 ZB 1174)
--- Non-applicant(s) For Applicant (s) : Ms. Divya Mishra, Advocate. For Non-Applicant(s) : None. CHANDRAKANT DEWANGAN Digitally signed by CHANDRAKANT DEWANGAN Date: 2025.01.17 17:22:37 +0530
2 Hon'ble Shri Justic
e Sanjay S. Agrawal
Order on Board 17/01/2025 1) Heard on admission. 2) This M.C.C. has been filed for restoration of MAC No.27 of 2013, which was dismissed in default by this Court vide order dated
06.01.2020. 3) For the reasons assigned in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit for restoration of the said appeal, I am inclined to allow the same. 4) Accordingly, the instant M.C.C. is allowed and MAC No.27 of 2013 is
directed to be restored to its original number. No order as to cost(s). -Sd/- (Sanjay S. Agrawal) Judge Chandrakant