IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 13211 OF 2024 Ravi Ganpatrao Madrewar And Others VERSUS Bhimashankar Narayan Gadewar And Others Mr. R. S. Patil, Advocate for Petitioners Mr. A. A. Khande, Advocate for Respondent No. 3 Mr. V. P. Latange, Advocate for Respondent No. 4 Mr. S. N. Kendre, AGP for Respondents/State CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J. DATE : 01st April, 2025 PER COURT :- 1. This petition takes exception to the order dated 03.09.2024 passed by Trial Court below Exhibit 394. The petitioners are original plaintiffs, they filed Application Exhibit 394. Learned Trial Court though has observed that the application is pre-mature however went to dismiss the same. Petitioners- plaintiffs have grievance about the dismissal of the said application. 2. Learned Trial Court has passed order below Exhibit 394 which reads thus :- 1- lnj fu’kk.khojhy fnukad 06@01@2020 jksthpk vkns’k igk- 2- izLrqr vtkZeqGs oknh ;kauh U;k;ky;hu 6-WP-13211-2024.odt 1 of 3 2025:BHC-AUG:10174 dkxni=kae/;s QsjQkj dsY;kcíy laca/khrkaojrh Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk dye 218 izek.ks QkStnkjh dkjokbZ dj.;kph ekx.kh dsyh vkgs- ;k vtkZe/;s ?kVukdze ueqn dsyk vlqu fnukad 28@02@2017 jksth rks vtZ fnyk vkgs- 2- 1½ ek>;k iqoZfiBklhu vf/kdk&;kauh lnj vtkZoj vkns’k d#u izfroknh dz- 3 pk iqjkok iq.kZ gksbZi;Zar vtkZojhy vkns’k LFkfxr Bsoyk- 3- ;kdkeh fo/khK Jh- eqjdwVs o Jh- ‘ksGds] Jh- f{kjlkxj o Jh- ?kksxjs ;kauh ;qfäokn dsY;koj vls fnlqu ;srs dh] lnjpk vtZ gk ;k dkekP;k vafre ;qfäoknkuarj fudkyi=ke/;s ;k ?kVusP;k vuq”kaxkus tj dkgh rF;s vk<Gwu vkys rj R;k vuq”kaxkus fudkyi=krgh funsZ’k ns.;kr ;sÅ ‘kdrhy- vtZ nk[ky d#u oknhauh th oLrqfLFkrh leksj vk.kyh vkgs] R;kvuq”kaxkus iqjkok >kysyk vkgs- ;kdkeh tj dks.khgh O;äh nks”kh vk<Gys rj R;k O;ähfo#/n vko’;d rh dk;ns’khj dkjokbZ dj.;kckcr fudkyi=ke/;s vkns’k ns.;klkBh U;k;ky;kyk loZ vf/kdkj vkgsr- R;keqGs ;k vtkZoj vkns’k dj.ks l|fLFkrhyk xjtsps okVr ukgh- ek= vtkZrhy dFkus o R;kvuq”kaxkus vko’;d rs vkns’k udkyi=kr fuÜphr dj.;kr ;srhy- R;keqGs lnjpk vtZ eqnriwoZ vlY;kus ukeatqj dj.;kr ;srks- 3. This order clearly indicates that the Trial Court was not intending to reject the application on merit. However, it is said to be pre-mature. Once, Court comes to the conclusion that the application is pre-mature, question of rejection of the same does not arise. If such rejection is not set aside, the same will cause prejudice to the plaintiffs in pursuing the said application at appropriate stage of the proceeding. Hence, impugned order is set aside. 6-WP-13211-2024.odt 2 of 3 4. Application Exhibit 394 be taken up for consideration by the Trial Court in accordance with law at appropriate stage of proceeding. Parties to act upon authenticated copy. (R. M. JOSHI, J.) bsj 6-WP-13211-2024.odt 3 of 3