[2025:RJ-JP:17695] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19110/2018 Priya Kumari Meena D/o Sirmohar Meena, aged about 22 years, R/o Village Khedhisheesh Post Bargma, Tehsil Hindaun City, District Karauli. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Rajasthan, through its Principal Secretary, Rural Development and Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Saumil Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Gopal Krishan Sharma, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 25/04/2025 1. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner, despite the fact that case was called twice today. 2. The petitioner in the instant writ petition is laying challenge to Clause 9.6 of advertisement dated 31.07.2018, issued by the respondents for recruitment on the post of 'Teacher Grade-III Level -II (English)' and has also prayed for a direction to accept his form offline by treating him eligible and to appoint him on the aforesaid post, in case his name finds place in merit. 3. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of Trilok Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. in D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.667/2015 and on that basis, this Court earlier passed one [2025:RJ-JP:17695] (2 of 2) [CW-19110/2018] interim order dated 27.08.2018, allowing the petitioner to participate provisionally in the recruitment process. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents has also informed that judgment of Trilok Ram (supra) passed by this Court was further challenged before the Hon'ble Supreme Court by way of filing S.L.P. (C) No.309/2017, wherein the similar condition in the advertisement has been upheld by observing that the candidates are required to possess the requisite qualification for eligibility on the last date of submission of application form. As per memo of writ petition, petitioner was not possessing such qualification on the prescribed last date. 5. Hence, in view of above discussions, no interference is called for in the instant writ petition and the same is hereby dismissed. 6. Stay application as well as all pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J DAKSH/154