1 2025:CGHC:29379 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6744 of 2025 1 - Kishan Kumar Uraon S/o Late Shri Motilal Uraon Aged About 45 Years Presently Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Primary Schol Birgahni, Block - Kota, District - Bilaspur (C.G.) --- Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahandi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Joint Director Education Division Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - The Collector Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur (C.G.) 5 - The District Education Officer Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur (C.G.) --- Respondents 2025:CGHC:29385 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6766 of 2025 1 - Deepak Tigga D/o Shri Karan Sai Bhagat Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Makarchunva, Post And Tahsil Bagbahar, Dist. Jashpur Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh Digitally signed by MOHAMMAD AADIL KHAN 2 2 - Joint Director Of Public Education, Office Of Directorate Of Public Education, Indravati Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Joint Director, School Education, Sarguja Division, Ambikapur Chhattisgarh 4 - The Collector, Office Of The Collector, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh 5 - The District Education Officer, District Education Office, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh 6 - The Block Education Officer, Manora, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh --- Respondents 2025:CGHC:29391 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6780 of 2025 1 - Damrudhar Rathiya S/o Late Shri Mangal Singh Aged About 37 Years Presently Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Primary School Kanya Ashram Khamhar, Block- Kharsiya, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. --- Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhatisgarh. 3 - The Joint Director Education Division Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh. 4 - The Collector Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh. 5 - The District Education Officer Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh. --- Respondens 2025:CGHC:29400 NAFR 3 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6802 of 2025 1 - Amarjeet Solanki S/o Shri Shivdhari Ram Aged About 56 Years R/o Village- Kedarpur, Tahsil - Premnagar, Distt.- Surajpur (C.G.) --- Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur, (C.G.) 2 - Joint Director School Education Surguja Division, Ambikapur, (C.G.) 3 - The Collector Office Of The Collector District- Surajpur (C.G.) 4 - The District Education Officer District Education Office, District- Surajpur (C.G.) 5 - The Block Education Officer Premnagar, District- Surajpur (C.G.) --- Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Mr. Kaushal Yadav, Advocate. For State- Respondents : Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, Govt. Advocate and Ms. Anuja Sharma, Mr. Santosh Bharat and Mr. Shreyansh Mehta, Panel Lawyers. Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 01-07-2025 1. By way of these writ petitions, the petitioner(s) is/are challenging the impugned transfer order(s) and action of the respondents whereby the petitioner(s) has/have been declared surplus Teacher(s) and consequently transferred under the Teacher Rationalization Instructions. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioner in WPS No.6780/2025 has not joined at his transferred place whereas the petitioners in other petitions have not joined at their transferred place. It is further submitted that the list of surplus Teachers published by the respondents is against the rationalization instructions and the same is arbitrary as no proper opportunity of hearing was given to the petitioner(s) and if the petitioner(s) is/are not granted relief, he/she/they will suffer with irreparable loss. Learned counsel for the petitioners would further submit that the petitioners still want 4 to pursue their representation before the concerned authorities to redress their grievances. 3. Learned counsel for the State would submit that after due verification of records the petitioner(s) has/have been transferred under the rationalization instructions issued by the State Government. It is further submitted that if the petitioner(s) is/are having any grievance, he/she/they may move fresh representation before the concerned District/Divisional Rationalization Committee and the Committee will take a decision on his/her/their representation(s) in accordance with law within a stipulated period. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings and documents. 5. In view of submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the petitioner(s) is/are directed to make fresh representation(s) before the concerned District/Divisional Rationalization Committee within a period of five days from today and thereafter the Committee shall decide the same within a further period of five days from the date of receipt of representation(s) in accordance with law in objective manner. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, these writ petitions stand disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Aadil