Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:CGHC:35264-DB
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WA No. 479 of 2025 The Managing Director Chhattisgarh Infrastructure Development Corporation, Raipur, C.G. Rajya Kaushal Vikas Pradhikaran Bhavan, 2nd Floor Old Police H.Q. Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Gunjan Adile S/o Late Ishwar Das Adile Aged About 29 Years R/o Behind Kims Hospital, Ambedkar Nagar, Magarpara, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Public Relation, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhavan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Secretary Department Of Water Resources, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Director Directorate Public Relation (Sanchalak, Jansampark (Sanchanalaya), Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Collector Collectorate Office, Mungeli, District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 6 - Additional Collector Collectorate Office, Mungeli, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh 7 - Nodal Officer Cidc, C.G. Rajya Kaushal Vikas Pradhikaran Bhavan, 2nd Floor Old Police H.Q. Raipur Chhattisgarh ...Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Appellant : Shri Rajeev Shrivastava, Senior Advocate along with Shri Vivek Siddharth Ojha, Advocate For Respondent/State : Shri SS Baghel, Dy GA For Private Respondent : Shri Sumit Shrivastava, Advocate --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Digitally signed by V PADMAVATHI Date: 2025.07.24 10:39:36 +0530
Wa 479 of 2025 2 Order on Board Per
Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice
23.07.2025 Heard Shri Rajeev Shrivastava, learned Senior Advocate along with Shri Vivek Siddharth Ojha, learned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Shri SS Baghel, learned Dy GA, and Shri Sumit Shrivastava, learned counsel for the respective respondents.
1. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the appellant prays for withdrawal of the appeal with liberty to avail other alternative remedy available to him under the provisions of law.
2. Prayer is allowed.
3. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice
padma