Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3099 (GAU)

ROYAL SUNDARAM G.I.C. LTD. v. SMT. BHARATI BHUYAN KONWAR AND 2 ORS

I.A.(Civil)/210/2024 · 2026-04-27

Pranjal Das

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC020007832024 2025:GAU-NL:12 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/210/2024 ROYAL SUNDARAM G.I.C. LTD. HAVING ITS REGISTERED AND HEAD OFFICE AT VISHRANTHI MELARAM TOWERS NO. 2/319, RAJIV GANDHI SALAI, KARAPAKKAM, CHENNAI-600002 AND REGIONAL AND DIVISIONAL OFFICES IN SEVERAL PLACES INCLUDING A REGIONAL OFFICE AT GUWAHATI, ASSAM VERSUS SMT. BHARATI BHUYAN KONWAR AND 2 ORS W/O LATE RAGHI KONWAR R/O NEW SONOWAL, NAGAJANGKA MARIANI, P.S. MARIANI DIST- JORHAT, ASSAM-785634 Advocate for the Petitioner : VIKRAMJEET DEVNATH, Advocate for the Respondent : , Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG ORDER 28.01.2025 No one appears on behalf of the applicant on call. This is an application filed under section-5 of limitation the Act, seeking Condonation of delay for 321 (three hundred twenty-one) days in preferring the connected appeal against the Award dated 16.10.2023 passed in MAC Case no. 40 of 2018. By the Order dated 03.12.2024, this Court on perusal of the application indicated that the grounds contained in application, more particularly the contents of paragraph-7 is not satisfactory. Accordingly, the applicant was granted time to file additional affidavit, providing opportunity for improvement. However, the application has not been improved till date. On the contrary the applicant kept on taking adjournment and remains absent on 24.01.2025. Today also no one appears on behalf of the applicant on call. From the above it appears that the applicant is no interest to pursue with matter. In view of the above, this application is dismissed for non prosecution. JUDGE Comparing Assistant