Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30981 (PNJ)

TARSEM BANSAL AND ANR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR

CRA-AD/516/2019 · 2025-08-12

Anupinder Singh Grewal, Deepak Manchanda

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 226 TARSEM BANSAL AND ANR STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK Present: Mr. B.D. Sharma, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Kuljeet Singh, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. Ms. Deepa Negi Ms. Harveen Kaur, Advocate ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (ORAL) This criminal appeal has arisen out of the judgment of the appellate Court dated 04.01.2019 Section 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. Learned senior counsel for criminal case was an offshoot of a family dispute over settlement of the assets. This Court, on 11.12.2023, had directed the parties to appear before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court. The report of the dated 11.01.2024 at a settlement. The settlement agreement dated 11.01.2024 is taken on record. Further, the said agreement was amended as time granted to respondent No.2 to vacate the premises was extended uptil 30.09.2025 and in this regard statement of respondent No.2 was recorded in which was decided on 27.03.2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CRA-AD-516-2019 DATE OF DECISION: 12.08.2025 TARSEM BANSAL AND ANR. Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR. HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK Mr. B.D. Sharma, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Kuljeet Singh, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. G.S. Punia, Senior Advocate with Ms. Deepa Negi, Advocate and Ms. Harveen Kaur, Advocate for respondent No.2. ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (ORAL) This criminal appeal has arisen out of the judgment of the appellate dated 04.01.2019 whereby the accused were acquitted of offences under Section 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. Learned senior counsel for respondent No.2 criminal case was an offshoot of a family dispute over settlement of the assets. This Court, on 11.12.2023, had directed the parties to appear before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court. The report of the dated 11.01.2024 has been received which indicates that the parties have arrived at a settlement. The settlement agreement dated 11.01.2024 is taken on record. said agreement was amended as time granted to respondent No.2 to vacate the premises was extended uptil 30.09.2025 and in this regard statement of respondent No.2 was recorded in the order passed in which was decided on 27.03.2025. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2019 DATE OF DECISION: 12.08.2025 … Appellants (s) ... Respondent(s) HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA Mr. B.D. Sharma, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Kuljeet Singh, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. G.S. Punia, Senior Advocate with respondent No.2. This criminal appeal has arisen out of the judgment of the appellate whereby the accused were acquitted of offences under respondent No.2 submits that the criminal case was an offshoot of a family dispute over settlement of the assets. This Court, on 11.12.2023, had directed the parties to appear before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court. The report of the Mediator has been received which indicates that the parties have arrived at a settlement. The settlement agreement dated 11.01.2024 is taken on record. said agreement was amended as time granted to respondent No.2 to vacate the premises was extended uptil 30.09.2025 and in this regard statement the order passed in RSA No.1559 of 2014 This criminal appeal has arisen out of the judgment of the appellate whereby the accused were acquitted of offences under submits that the This Court, on 11.12.2023, had directed the parties to appear before Mediator has been received which indicates that the parties have arrived at a settlement. The settlement agreement dated 11.01.2024 is taken on record. said agreement was amended as time granted to respondent No.2 to vacate the premises was extended uptil 30.09.2025 and in this regard statement RSA No.1559 of 2014 SWARNJIT SINGH 2025.08.13 16:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRA-AD-516-2019 -2- In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, the appeal stands disposed of. Both the parties shall remain abide by the settlement dated 11.01.2024 and the statement recorded on 27.03.2025, as referred above. (ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE (DEEPAK MANCHANDA) JUDGE 12.08.2025 SwarnjitS Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No SWARNJIT SINGH 2025.08.13 16:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document