1 / 2 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 71 of 2017 • Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Limited Through Branch Manager, Shivmohan Bhawan, Vidhansabha Road, Pandri, Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur, Chhattisgarh .....Insurance Company Of Vehicle Pickup No. C.G.18/ H-1231, ... Appellant versus 1. Smt. Shanti Wd/o Late Mangalram, Aged About 23 Years. 2. Ku. Puja D/o Late Mangalram, Aged About 3 Years. 3. Raju S/o Late Mangalram, Aged About 10 Months. 4. Sudru Ram S/o Late Tokdu, Aged About 58 Years. Respondent No. 2 & 3 minor represented through natural guardian mother Smt. Shanti respondent No.1, All R/o village Patarpara, Tahsil Bhairamagarh, District Bijapur(C.G.) 5. Satish Vishwas S/o Motilal Vishwas, R/o Nagar Panchayat Sukma Kumharras, Tahsil Sukma, District Sukma, Chhattisgarh ....Driver Of Vehicle Pickup No. C.G.18/ H-1231, 6. Ravindra Bala S/o Surjo Kant Bala, Aged About 49 Years R/o Nagar Panchayat Sukma Patnampara, Tahsil Sukma, District Sukma, Chhattisgarh .....Owner Of Vehicle Pickup No. C.G.18 / H-1231, ... Respondent(s) For Appellant : None. For Respondents No.1 to 4. For respondents No. 5 & 6. : : Ms. Pranoti Das, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Goutam Khetrapal, Advocate. None. VAIBHAV SINGH Digitally signed by VAIBHAV SINGH Date: 2025.04.17 15:33:12 +0530 2 / 2 Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal Order on Board 17/04/2025 1. On previous date of hearing i.e. 09.01.2025, no one had appeared on behalf of the appellant and today also despite repeated calls, no one appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the appellant. 2. In that view of the matter, this Court has left with no other option except to dismiss the case for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Radhakishan Agrawal) Judge Vaibhav