Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30976 (KAR)

AADESH, v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/8789/2023 · 2025-01-23

S R Krishna Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:2781 CRL.P No. 8789 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 8789 OF 2023 BETWEEN: AADESH, SON OF ANISH BABU, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, RESIDING AT ALAVIL, KANNUR, KERALA - 670 008. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ANKITH JAIN, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. GAUTAM SHREEDHAR BHARADWAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: STATE OF KARNATAKA, ALUR POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560 001. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. VINAY MAHADEVAIAH, HCGP) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC PRAYING TO QUASHING THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.151 OF 2023 QUA THE PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.68, PENDING ON THE FILE OF CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALUR, HASSAN FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCE P/U/S 188 AND 269 OF IPC, SEC. 32 AND 34 OF KARNATAKA EXCISE ACT 1965, SEC. 20(B) AND 27(B) Digitally signed by KAVYA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:2781 CRL.P No. 8789 of 2023 OF THE NARCOTIC DRUGS AND PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES ACT, 1985 AND SEC. 51(B) OF THE DISASTER MANAGEMENT ACT, 2005 ARISING OUT OF FIR BEARING CR.NO.80 OF 2021 REGISTERED BY ALLUR POLICE STATION, PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-A TO ANNEXURE-D RESPECTIVELY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR ORAL ORDER In this petition, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs: "a. Issue an order quashing the entire proceedings in C.C No.151 of 2023 qua the Petitioner/Accused No.68, pending on the file of Civil Judge and JMFC, Alur, Hassan for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 188 and 269 of Indian Penal Code, Sections 32 and 34 of Karnataka Excise Act 1965, Sections 20(B) and 27 (B) o the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 and Section 51(B) of the Disaster Management Act, 2005 arising out of FIR bearing Crime No.0080 of 2021 registered by Allur Police Station for the offences punishable Under Section 188 and 269 of Indian Penal Code and Section 32 and 34 of Karnataka Excise Act 1965. Produced as Annexure-A to Annexure-D respectively. b. Grant such other relief as this Hon'ble deems fit to meet the ends of Justice." - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:2781 CRL.P No. 8789 of 2023 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned HCGP for the respondent and perused the material on record. 3. In addition to reiterating the various contentions urged in the petition and referring to the material on record, learned counsel for the petitioner-accused No.68 invited my attention to the order passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Crl.P.No.3851/2024 dated 21.11.2024, in order to contend that the said petition having been filed by accused No.71, who was similarly/identically situated as that of the petitioner, the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court quashed the said proceedings qua the petitioner therein, who was arraigned as accused No.71. It is therefore submitted that by virtue of Doctrine of Parity, the impugned proceedings qua the petitioner-accused No.68 also deserves to be quashed. 4. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent submits that there is no merit in the matter and the same is liable to be dismissed. - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:2781 CRL.P No. 8789 of 2023 5. As rightly contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner, a perusal of the material on record, will indicate that both the petitioner herein who is arraigned as accused No.68 as well as Kevin Cheriyar, who is arraigned as accused No.71, are similarly/ identically placed and the proceedings qua the aforesaid Kevin Cheriyar - accused No.71 was allowed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the aforesaid petition and quashed the proceedings qua the petitioner, by holding as under: "6. On perusal of the complaint and other documents, the Police has to investigate the case under Section 188 of IPC as there is a bar for registering case under Section 195 of Cr.P.C. The Police cannot register F.I.R or file charge sheet for the offence under Section 188 of IPC as complainant has to file private complaint. Apart from that petitioner is said to be only a visitor in the party. This Court has held in a catena of decisions that where Sections 32 and 34 of Karnataka Excise Act is invoked by the Police, Police shall obtain warrant from the Magistrate under Section 53 of the Karnataka Excise Act. If the Police have not obtained the warrant due to urgency, they shall record the reason in writing under Section 54 of the Karnataka Excise Act. That apart, the Police must register the F.I.R under Section 151 of Cr.P.C., prior to proceeding for seizing the articles, but in this case, property was seized prior to registration of F.I.R. The Police have also invoked Section 51(B) of the Disaster Management Act, whereas the private complaint is required to be filed under Section 51 of the Disaster Management Act. Police cannot register the FIR. The investigation conducted by the Police is hit by Section 50 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. Therefore, the criminal proceedings against the petitioner is not sustainable. - 5 - NC: 2025:KHC:2781 CRL.P No. 8789 of 2023 7. This Court also quashed the criminal proceedings as against Accused No.53 in Criminal Petition No.9483/2023 dated 24.01.2024. In view of the gross violation of the provisions under Cr.P.C., Disaster Management Act as well as Karnataka Excise Act, the proceedings against the petitioner cannot be sustained. 8. The Criminal Petition is allowed. The criminal proceedings against the petitioner/Accused No.71 in C.C.No.151/2023 pending on the file of the Civil Judge and JMFC, Alur, is hereby quashed." 6. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances and the material on record, which indicate that the proceedings as against accused No.71, who was similarly/identically situated to the petitioner - accused No.68, I am of the considered view that by applying / invoking the Doctrine of Parity, the impugned proceedings qua the petitioner- accused No.68, also deserves to be quashed. 7. Accordingly, I pass the following: ORDER (i) The Criminal Petition is allowed; and (ii) The impugned proceedings in C.C.No.151/2023 arising out of Crime No.0080/2021 registered by the Alur Police Station, pending on the file of the Civil Judge - 6 - NC: 2025:KHC:2781 CRL.P No. 8789 of 2023 and JMFC, Alur, Hassan, qua the petitioner-accused No.68, is hereby quashed. Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE SJK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8 CT: BHK