Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30976 (AP)

SHAIK FATHIMA BEGUM v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/22837/2025 · 2025-08-29

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

AP+H CM0448552025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) SATURDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 22837 OF 2025 Between: Shaik Fathima Begum, W/o. Shaik Kaleem Basha, aged about 59 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o. D.No. 4-5-10-2D, Marpuri Street, Indira Nagar, Madanapalle Town, Annamayya District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. Department 2. The District Collector, Annamayya District Rayachoti. 3. The Sub Collector, Madanapalle, Annamayya District. 4. The Tahsildar, Madanapalle Mandal, Annamayya District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the inaction of the 2nd respondent in Issuing orders for deletion of the petitioner's land in Sy.No. situated at Chinnathippasamudram 685/B2 admeasuring Ac. 1.00 cents village, Madanapalle Mandal, Annamayya District, Rayachoti, from the list of the prohibited properties inspite of sending the proposals by the 3rd respondent dt. 30-4-2025 bearing Roc. B/315/202, as being illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional, and" consequently direct the 2"^^ respondent to issue ' necessary orders pursuant to the endorsement dt. 4-8-2025 and 30-4-2025 of the 4**^ respondent. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders pursuant to the representation dt. 12-8-2025, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI BABUJI TENNETI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order: * )- APHC010448552025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] 5L SATURDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 22837/2025 Between: 1 SHAIK FATHIMA BEGUM, W/0 SHAIK KALEEM BASHA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O D.NO. 4-5- 10-2D, MARPURI STREET, INDIRA NAGAR, MADANAPALLE TOWN, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1 THE STATE OF AP, , REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI. REVENUE DEPARTMENT AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, , RAYACHOTI. 3.THE SUBCOLLECTOR, MADANAPALLE, DISTRICT. 4.THE TAHSILDAR, MADANAPALLE MANDAL, DISTRICT. ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT ANNAMAYYA ANNAMAYYA ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the inaction of the 2nd respondent in issuing orders for deletion of the petitioner's land in Sy.No. 685/B2 admeasuring Ac. 1.00 cents situated at Chinnathippasamudram village, Madanapalle Mandal, Annamayya District, Rayachoti, from the list of the prohibited properties inspite of sending the proposals by the 3rd respondent dt. Roc. B/315/202, as being illegal, arbitrary and 30-4-2025 bearing unconstitutional, and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to issue necessary orders pursuant to the endorsement dt. 4 8-2025 and 30- 4-2025 of the 4th respondent, and to grant such other relief or reliefs this Honble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the as case. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to Petition under Section 151 CPC 2 consider and pass appropriate orders pursuant to the representation dt. 12-8 2025, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.BABUJI TENNETI Counsel for the Respondent(S); 1.GP FOR REVENUE 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLAUA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.22837 of 2025 ORDER:- The present Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief; ...to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to particularly one . . declare the inaction of the 2"'' respondent in issuing orders for deletion of the petitioner's land in Sy.No.685/B2 situated at cents Ac. 1.00 admeasuring Chinnathippasamudram village, Madanapalle Mandal, Annamayya District, Rayachoti, from the list of the prohibited properties inspite of sending the proposals by the 3^'' respondent dt.30-4-2025 bearing Roc.B/315/202, being illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional, and consequently direct the 2"^^ respondent to issue necessary orders pursuant to the endorsement dt. 4-8-2025 and 30- 4-2025 of the 4**^ respondent, and to grant such other relief s ^ :I u as or reliefs... 2. Heard Sri Babuji Tenneti, learned counsel for petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for respondents. 3. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for petitioner it would suffice to direct the respondents to dispose of the representations dated 05.05.2025, 09.06.2025 and 09.07.2025. counsel for respondents does not refute the said submits that 4. Learned submission. In view of above submissions, without expressing any opinion on and with the consent of both the learned counsel, the present Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the respondents to 5. merits of the matter 4' examine representations dated 05.05.2025, 09.06.2025 and 09.07.2025, submitted by the petitioner, and to pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six (06) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any shall stand closed. N- nagamma assistant registrar i //TRUE COPY// SECTIO^FFICER To, 1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue . Department, State of Andhra Pradesh Secretariat. Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The District Coiiector, Annamayya District Rayachoti. 3. The Sub Coiiector, Madanapalle, Annamayya District. 4. The Tahsildar, Madanapalle Mandal 5. One CC to Sri Babuji Tenneti Annamayya District. Advocate (OPUC) 6. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court 7. Two C.D. Copies of Andhra Pradesh. (OUT) Cnr HIGH COURT DATED:30/08/2025 ORDER WP NO. 22837 OF 2025 i ?^SBnQ2b DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS