Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30966 (CHH)

MANAGING DIRECTOR v. KULDEEP SINGH THAKUR

WA/465/2025 · 2025-07-20

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:34350-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WA No. 465 of 2025 1 - Managing Director Chhattisgarh Infrastructure Development Corporation, Chhattisgarh Rajya Kaushal Vikas Pradhikaran Bhawan, Second Floor, Old Phq Campus, Near Raj Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh (Respondent No. 1). ... Appellant Versus 1 - Kuldeep Singh Thakur S/o Late Shri Santosh Singh Thakur Aged About 38 Years R/o Lig J/14, Ward No. 32, Dindayal Awas, Housing Board Colony, Near Pani Tanki, Rampur, Korba, District Korba Chhattisgarh (Petitioner) 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary General Administration Department, Raipur, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh (Respondent No. 2) 3 - Managing Director Sport And Youth Welfare Department (Transport Section), Sardar Vallabh Bhai Patel International Hockey Stadium Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh (Respondent No. 3) 4 - Chief Executive Officer Jila Panchayat, Janjgir, District - Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh (Respondent No. 4) 5 - Collector District Janjgir, District Janjgir-Champa Chhattisgarh (Respondent No. 5) ... Respondent(s) For Appellant : Shri Rajeev Shrivastava, Sr. Advocate along with Shri Malay Shrivastava, Shri Sourabh Sahu and Ms. Anu Mishra, Advocates. For Respondents : Shri Sangharsh Pandey, Dy. Advocate General, Shri Palash Tiwari and Anirudh Shrivastava, Advocates. Digitally signed by INDRAJEET SAHU Date: 2025.07.21 16:44:08 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Justice Ramesh Sinha, CJ Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J Order on Board 21.07.2025 Per, Ramesh Sinha, CJ. 1 After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the appellants prays for withdrawal of the writ appeal with liberty to avail other alternative remedy available to him under the provisions of law. 2 Prayer is allowed. 3 Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice inder