1 2025:CGHC:24282 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2778 of 2019 • M/s Uttam Con Infrastructure Co. Private Limited (A Company Incorporated Under The Provisions Of Companies Act, 1956) Through Its Authorised Director Mr. Rajesh Jain S/o Uttam Chand Jain, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Surabhi, Tahsil, Civil And Revenue District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 492007 ... Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Principal Secretary, Public Works Department, Mantralaya, Mahandi Gate Naya Raipur, Head Post Office Raipur, Police Station Telibandha, Raipur Tahsil Raipur, Civil And Revenue District Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. Engineer In Chief Public Works Department, Raipur, Sirpur Bhawan, Near Akashwani Tahsil Raipur, Civil And Revenue District Raipur, Chhattisgarh PIN 492001 3. Chief Engineer Public Works Department, Sirpur Bhawan, Near Akashwani Raipur Tahsil Raipur, Civil And Revenue District Raipur, Chhattisgarh PIN 492001 4. Finance Controller O/o Engineer In Chief, Public Works Department, Raipur, Sirpur Bhawan, Near Akashwani Tahsil Raipur, Civil And Revenue District Raipur, Chhattisgarh PIN 492001 5. Superintendent Engineer Public Works Department, Bridge Constructions Circle Raigarh, Chhattisgarh, And Civil And Revenue District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh PIN 492001 6. Executive Engineer Bridge Construction Division Bilaspur, Public Works Department, Bilaspur, Civil And Revenue District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh PIN 492001 ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Anand Mohan Tiwari, Advocate For State : Ms. Shailja Shukla, Deputy Government Advocate Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI 2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 16/06/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- 10.1 This Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to: (a) Issue the writ of mandamus and / or any other appropriate writ, order or direction thereby directing the Respondent no. 2 to 6 to reinstate the Petitioner to their Category/Grade A status; (b) Issue of writ of mandamus directing and quantifying appropriate damages in favour of the Petitioner and against the Respondent No. 2 to 6 and directions to the Respondent No. 1 to deduct the said damages from the Respondents. (c) Granting any other relief and the cost of the petition. 2. At the very outset, Mr. Anand Mohan Tiwari, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to revive if cause of action subsists. 3. No objection from other side. 4. Permission granted. 5. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty stated above. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti