MITHLESH KUMAR YADAV S/O SHRI BRAHAMDEV YADAV v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLW/1265/2025 · 2025-09-24
Avneesh Jhingan, Baljinder Singh Sandhu
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30957 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30957 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:39453-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Writ Petition (Parole) No. 1265/2025 Mithlesh Kumar Yadav S/o Shri Brahamdev Yadav, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Village Variyarpur, Police Station Variyarpur, Dis- trict Munger (Bihar) At Present R/o Suraj Cinema Rampura, Sant Ram Singh Colony Bhiwadi, P.s. Phoolbagh Bhiwadi, District Khairthal-Tijara (Raj.) (At Present In Central Alwar) Through His Wife Namely Shobha Devi W/o Mithlesh Kumar, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Suraj Cinema Rampura, Bhiwadi Sant Ram Singh Colony, P.s. Phoolbagh, District Khairthal-Tijara (Raj.) 301019. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary Home, Secre- tariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. The District Parole Advisory Committee, Through Its Chairman, District Magistrate, Khairthal-Tijara.
3. Superintendent Central Jail, Alwar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vishram Prajapati, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU Order 24/09/2025
1. This petition is filed aggrieved of rejection of the prayer for second parole.
2. The grievance raised is that the petitioner has suffered incarceration of more than nine years including the remission and after complying with the condition of the first parole surrendered within time, yet the prayer for second parole has been rejected.
[2025:RJ-JP:39453-DB] (2 of 2) [CRLW-1265/2025]
3. Learned Government Advocate-cum-AAG fairly submits that a circular dated 17.07.2025 has been issued with regard to considering the application for subsequent parole where the inmate had complied with the conditions of the earlier paroles.
4. In view of the above statement, the impugned order is set aside. The matter is remitted back to respondent No.2 to decide the application for second parole afresh in accordance with law taking into consideration the circular dated 17.07.2025.
5. It shall be appreciated if the application is considered and decided expeditiously not later than three weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
6. This criminal writ petition (parole) is allowed.
(BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J HIMANSHU SONI/TANISHA /73